Can we leave it to chance? New learning technologies and the problem of professional competence

International Education Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 126-137

  Anderson, Neil ^a   Baskin, Colin ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ICT in the classroom; Online teaching and learning; University school collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544374995     PISSN: 14431475     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Anderson, N. (1999). Equity and Learning Technologies Report. Education Queensland, Brisbane.
2. Barab, S., Thomas, M. & Merrill, H. (2001). On-line learning: From information dissemination to fostering collaboration. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12 (1), 105-144.
3. Baskin, C. (2001) The Titanic, Volkswagens, and Collaborative Group Work: Remaking Old Favourites with New Learning Technologies. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 17 (3), 265-278. [Online]: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ ajet/ajet17/baskin.html
4. Becker, J. & Riel, M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Teaching, Learning and Computing Report #7. Center for research on technology and organizations. University of California, Irvine. [Online]: http://www.crito.uci.edu/findings.html [October, 2002]
5. Becker, J. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives. [Online]: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/[2002]
6. Bohnenkamp, J. & McMahon, J. (2001). Click, Developing an online professional development program for teachers. Technology Horizons in Education, 28 (11), 21-25.
7. Burford, S. & Cooper, L. (2000). Online development using WebCT: A faculty managed process for quality. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (3), 201-214.
8. Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation. In Power Action & Belief, In Law, J. (Ed) Sociological Review, Routledge & Keegan Paul, London.
9. Cooper, L. (2001). Online and traditional computer applications classes. Technology Horizons in Education, 28 (8). [Online]: http://ts.miv.org/default. asp [October, 2002]
10. Cuban, L. (2000). So Much High-Tech Money Invested, So Little Use And Change In Practice: How Come? Paper prepared for the Council of Chief State School Officers' annual Technology Leadership Conference. Washington, D.C. (January).
11. Dabbagh, N. (2001). The challenges of interfacing between face-to-face and on-line instruction. TechTrends, 44 (6), 37-42.
12. Downes, T., Fluck, A., Gibbons, P., Leonard, R., Matthews, C., Oliver, R., Vickers, M. & Williams, M. (2001). Models of teacher professional development for the integration of ICT into classroom practice. DETYA funded project.
13. Gilbert, T.F. (1962), 'Mathetics: the technology of education', Journal of Mathetics, Volume 1,
14. reprinted as a supplement to Recall (1970), Longman, London.
15. Holland, P. (2001). Professional development in technology: Catalyst for school reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (2), [Online]: http://www.aace.org/pubs/jtate [2002]
16. Kearsley, G. (2002). MEPP: A case study in online education. The Technology Source, Jan-Feb. [Online]: http://ts.miv.org/default.asp [October, 2002]
17. Learning and Development Foundation (2002) Education Queensland. [Online]: http://education.qld.gov.au/learning-ent/ldf/ [October, 2002]
18. McVay-Lynch, M. (2001). Effective student preparation for online learning. The Technology Source, Nov-Dec. [Online]: http://ts.miv.org/default. asp [October, 2002]
19. National Centre for Education Statistics (1999). [Online]: http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/majorpub.asp [October, 2002]
20. National Quality Teacher Project (2001). [Online]: http://www.oten.edu. au/qtp/main.cfm [2002]
21. Peitenati, M., Giuli, D. & Khaled, A. (2001). Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (2). [Online]: http://www.aace.org/pubs/jtate [October, 2002]
22. Piguet, A. & Peraya, D. (2000). Creating web-integrated learning environments: An analysis of WebCT authoring tools in respect to usability. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (3), 302-314.
23. Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters. Revitalising teaching: critical choices. Report of the review of teacher education, New South Wales.
24. Sandholtz, J. (2001). Learning to teach with technology: A comparison of teacher development programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (3). [Online]: http://www.aace.org/pubs/jtate [October, 2002]
25. Stenhouse, L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Heinemann, London.
26. Tooney, R. (2001). Information and Communications Technology for Teaching and Learning. Schooling Issues Digest, 2. [Online]: http://www.dest.gov.au/ schools/Publications/2001/digest/technology.htm [October, 2002]
27. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and Technology: Making the Connection. [Online]: ftp://gandalf.isu.edu/pub/ota/teachers.tech [October, 2002]
28. Wang, A., & Newlin, M. (2001). On-line lectures: Benefits for the virtual classroom. Technology Horizons in Education, 29 (1). [Online]: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/M2634.cfm [October, 2002]
29. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice - Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Wilson, B. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Educational Technology, 35 (5), [Online]: http://www.mff.org/ edtech/ [October, 2002]
31. Wilson, C. (2001). Blackboard's courseinfo: Supplementing in-class teaching with the internet. History Computer Review, 17 (1), 39-67.