To speak or not to speak: Developing legal standards for anonymous speech on the internet

Informing Science

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 95-111

  Lipinski, Tomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anonymous Speech; Institutional Policies and Decision Making; Internet; Legal Standards and Compliance

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544369747     PISSN: 15214672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ballon, Ian C. (July/August, 1997). Defamation and Preemption under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Why the Rule in Zeran v. America Online is Wrong, Cyberspace Lawyer 2: 6-10.
2. Conference Report, House Report 104-458. (104th Congress, 2nd Session (1996)). (Conference Report on the Telecommunications Act of 1996). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
3. Counts, Cynthia L. and C. Amanda Martin. (1996). Libel in Cyberspace: A Framework for Addressing Liability and Jurisdictional Issues in this New Frontier, Albany Law Review, 59, 1083-1133.
4. Godkin, David S. and Marc E. Betinsky. (1999, July). Personal Jurisdiction: If the [International] Shoe Fits, Wear It - But Does it Fit the Net? Journal Of Internet Law, 17-.
5. Kane, Michelle J. (2000). Business law: 1. Electronic Commerce: b) Internet Service Provider Liability: Blumenthal v. Drudge, Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 14: 483-501.
6. Keeton, W. Page, et al. (5th ed. 1984). Prosser And Keeton On The Law Of Torts. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group.
7. Lipinski, Tomas A. (1999). Designing and Using Web-Based Materials in Education: A Web Page Legal Audit-Part II, Information Liability Issues, Education Law Reporter 137: [21] (October 14, 1999).
8. Lipinski, Tomas A. (2001). Legal Issues Involved in the Privacy Rights of Patrons in "Public" Libraries and Archives, in Libraries, Museums And Archives: Legal Issues And Challenges In The New Information Era 95-111 (Tomas A. Lipinski editor). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
9. Lipinski, Tomas A., Elizabeth A. Buchanan, and Johannes J. Britz. (2002). Sticks and Stones and Words that Harm: Liability vs. Responsibility, Section 230 and Defamatory Speech in Cyberspace, Ethics and Information Technology (forthcoming).
10. Restatement of Torts, Restatements of the Law, Second, Torts. (1977). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: American Law Institute.
11. Spencer, Michael H. (2000). Defamatory E-Mail and Employer Liability: Why Razing Zeran v. America Online Is a Good Thing, Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 6: 25-.
12. Street, F. Lawrence and Mark P. Grant. (2001). Law of the Internet. Newark: New Jersey: LexisNexis.
13. Talbot, James M. (1999). New Media: Intellectual Property, Entertainment And Technology Law. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group.
14. Wiener, David. (1999). Negligent Publication of Statements Posted on Electronic Bulletin Boards: Is There Any Liability Left After Zeran?, Santa Clara Law Review 39: 905-939.
15. Zuckman, Harvey L., et al. (2001). Modern Communications Law. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group.
16. Ben Ezra, Einstein & Co. v. American Online, Inc., 206 F. 3d 980 (10th Cir. 2000).
17. Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp 2d 44 (D.D.C. 1998).
18. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, 525 U.S. 182 (1999).
19. Columbia Insurance Co. v. Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. 573 (N.D. Cal. 1999).
20. Dendrite International, Inc. v. John Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. Super. Ct. 2001),
21. Doe v. 2TheMart.com, Inc., 140 F. Supp. 2d 140 1088 (W.D. Wash. F. Supp. 2d at 1092. 2001).
22. Doe v. American Online, Inc., 783 So. 2d 1010 (Florida 2001).
23. Firth v. State of New York, 184 Misc.2d 105 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 2000).
24. Immunomedics, Inc. v. Doe., 775 A.2d 773 (N.J. Super. Ct. 2001).
25. In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to America Online, Inc., 52 Va. Cir. 26 (2000).
26. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).
27. Kathleen R. v. City of Livermore, 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 772 (Cal. App. 2001).
28. Lunney v. Prodigy Services Co., 701 N.Y.S.2d 684 (1999); cert. denied 120 S. Ct. 1832 (1999);
29. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995).
30. Reno v. A.C.L.U., 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
31. Stoner v. eBay. Inc., No. 305666 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco County, Nov. 7, 2000).
32. Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 229, 23 Media L. Reporter (BNA) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 24, 1995).
33. Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960).
34. Van Buskirk v. The New York Times Co., 2000 WL 1206732 (S.D.N.Y Aug. 24, 2000).
35. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York v. Village of Stratton, 122 S. Ct. 2080 (2002).
36. Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 937 (1998).