Assessing the pension reform potential of a notional defined contribution pillar

International Social Security Review

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-64

  Williamson, John B ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444409901     PISSN: 0020871X     EISSN: 1468246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-871x.2004.00180.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barr, N. 2000. Reforming pensions: Myths, truths, and policy choices (Working Paper WP/00/139). Washington, DC, Inter national Monetary Fund.
2. Bender, C.; Mac Arthur, I. W. 2000. “Country pro file for Mongolia” (Annex B7), in R. Holzmann, I. W. MacArthur and Y. Sin (eds.), Pension systems in East Asia and the Pacific: Challenges and opportunities (Social Protection Discussion Paper, No. 0014). Washington, DC, World Bank.
3. Borella, M. 2001. Social security systems and the distribution of income: An application to the Italian case (Working Paper 8/01). Moncalieri, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies.
4. Brugiavini, A.; Fornero, E. 1998. A pension system in transition: The case of Italy. Moncalieri, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies.
5. Castel, P.; Fox, L. 2001. “Gender dimensions of pension reform in the former Soviet Union”, in R. Holzmann and J. E. Stiglitz (eds.), New ideas about old age security. Washington, DC, World Bank.
6. Cichon, M. 1999. “Notional defined-contribution schemes: Old wine in new bottles?”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 52, No. 4.
7. Chłoń, A. 2000. Pension reform and public information in Poland (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0019). Washington, DC, World Bank.
8. Chłoń-Domińczak, A. 2002. “The Polish pension reform of 1999”, in E. Fultz(ed.), Pension reform in central and eastern Europe — Vol. 1: Restructuring with privatization (case studies of Hungary and Poland). Buda pest, International Labour Office.
9. Disney, R. 1999. Notional accounts as a pension reform strategy: An evaluation (Social Protection Discussion Paper, No. 9928). Washington, DC, World Bank.
10. Dixon, J. 1999. Social security in global perspective. Westport, CT, Praeger.
11. Fox, L. 1997. “Pension reform in the post-communist transition economies”, in J. M. Nelson, C. Tilley and L. Walker(eds.), Transforming post-communist political economies. Washing ton, DC, National Research Council.
12. Fox, L.; Palmer, E. 1999. Latvian pension reform (Social Protection Discussion Paper, No. 9922). Washington, DC, World Bank.
13. Fox, L.; Palmer, E. 2001. “New approaches to multipillar pension systems: What in the world is going on?”, in R. Holzmann and J. E. Stiglitz (eds.), New ideas about old age security. Washing ton, DC, World Bank.
14. Franco, D. 2002. “Italy: A never-ending pension reform”, in M. Feldstein and H. Siebert (eds.), Social security pension reform in Europe. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
15. Fultz, E.; Ruck, M.; Steinhilber, S. (ed.). 2003. The gender dimensions of social security reform in central and eastern Europe: Case studies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Budapest, International Labour Office.
16. Fultz, E.; Ruck, M. 2001. “Pension reform in central and eastern Europe: Emerging issues and patterns”, in International Labour Review, Vol. 140, No. 1.
17. Gillion, C.; Turner, J.; Bailey, C.; Latulippe, D. 2000. Social security pensions: Development and reform. Geneva, International Labour Office.
18. Gray, C.; Weig, D. 1999. Pension system issues and their relation to economic growth (CAER II Discussion Paper, No. 41). Cambridge, MA, Harvard Institute for International Development.
19. Hamann, A. J. 1997. The reform of the pension system in Italy (Working Paper No. 97/18). Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
20. Hausner, J. 2002. “Security through diversity”, in M. Feldstein and H. Siebert (eds.), Social security pension reform in Europe. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
21. Holzmann, R.; Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.). 2001. New ideas about old age security: Toward sustainable pension systems in the 21st century. Washington, DC, World Bank.
22. Ivanov, A.; Stroutchenevski, A. 2003. Pension reform: Eyeing Russia’s nest egg. Moscow, Troika Dialog Research.
23. James, E. 1999. New models for old age security — How can they be applied in China? (paper presented at the WBI and MOLSS work shop, 1-5 June). Beijing.
24. James, E.; Edwards, A. C.; Wong, R. 2003. The gender impact of pension reform: A cross-country analysis (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3074). Washington, DC, World Bank.
25. Jappelli, T.; Padula, M.; Bottazzi, R. 2003. Retirement expectations and pension reforms (Working Paper No. 92). Salerno, University of Salerno, Center for Studies in Economics and Finance.
26. Kritzer, B. E. 2000. “Social security privatization in Latin America”, in Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 2.
27. Müller, K. 2000. “The politics of pension reform in East-Central Europe”, in J. Beyer, J. Wielgohs and H. Wiesenthal (eds.), Successful transitions: Political factors of socio-economic progress in post-socialist countries. Baden-Baden, Nomos.
28. Myles, J.; Pierson, P. 2001. “The comparative political economy of pension reform”, in P. Pierson (ed.), The new politics of the welfare state. New York, Oxford University Press.
29. Normann, G.; Mitchell, D. J. 2000. Pension reform in Sweden: Lessons for American policymakers (Backgrounder No. 1381). Washington, DC, Heritage Foundation.
30. Orenstein, M. A. 2000. How politics and institutions affect pension reform in three postcommunist countries (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2310). Washington, DC, World Bank.
31. Palme, J. 2003. The “great” Swedish pension reform. Stockholm, Swedish Institute.
32. Palmer, E. 2000. The Swedish pension reform model: Frame work and issues (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0012). Washington, DC, World Bank.
33. Palmer, E. 2002. “Swedish pension reform: How did it evolve, and what does it mean for the future?”, in M. Feldstein and H. Siebert (eds.), Social security pension reform in Europe. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
34. Social Security Administration (SSA). 1999. Social security pro grams through out the world —1999. Washing ton, DC, US Government Printing Office.
35. Stańko, D. 2003. Polish pension funds, does the system work? Cost, efficiency and performance measurement issues (Discussion Paper PI-0302). London, University of London, Pensions Institute, Birkbeck College.
36. Sundén, A. 2000. How will Sweden’s new pension system work? (Issue Brief No. 3). Chestnut Hill, MA, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
37. Turner, J. 1998. Retirement income systems for different economic, demographic and political environments (Working Paper AWP 3.8). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
38. Valdés-Prieto, S. 2000. “The financial stability of notional account pensions”, in Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 102, No. 3.
39. Williamson, J. B. 2001. “Privatizing public pension systems: Lessons from Latin America”, in Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3.
40. Williamson, J. B.; Zheng, B. 2003. “The applicability of the notional defined contribution model for China”, in China and World Economy, Vol. 11, No. 3.
41. Williamson, J. B.; Pampel, F. C. 1993. Old-age security in comparative perspective. New York, Oxford University Press.
42. World Bank. 2001. Notional accounts: Notional defined contribution plans as a pension reform strategy (Pension Reform Primer). Washington, DC.
43. World Bank. 1994. Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. New York, Oxford University Press.