|
Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2874-2875
|
Do PET and SNB reduce the rate of elective neck dissection? A hypothesis still in need of validation [14]
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CISPLATIN;
CANCER STAGING;
CANCER SURGERY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
DRUG MEGADOSE;
HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA;
HUMAN;
HYPOTHESIS;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
NECK DISSECTION;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE;
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;
TREATMENT PLANNING;
UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
ELECTIVE SURGERY;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
METHODOLOGY;
MOUTH TUMOR;
NOTE;
OROPHARYNX TUMOR;
PATHOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
SCINTISCANNING;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
HUMANS;
MOUTH NEOPLASMS;
NECK DISSECTION;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
OROPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS;
POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 18444409006
PISSN: 0732183X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.338 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (2)
|