How would revealing the identity of gamete donors affect current practice?

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 564-566

  Garcia Velasco, Juan A ^a   Garrido, Nicolás ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Donor; Gamete donation; Identity

Indexed keywords

ANONYMOUS TESTING; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CULTURAL FACTOR; EUROPE; GAMETE; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFERTILITY; OOCYTE DONATION; REVIEW; SPAIN; SPERM DONOR; UNITED KINGDOM;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

EID: 18444406592     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61660-4     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Ahuja K, Simons E, Nair S et al. 2003 Minimizing risk in anonymous egg donation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20, 504-505.
2. Blyth E 2004 Gamete donation - where is the evidence that there are benefits in removing the anonymity of donors? A rejoinder to a patient's viewpoint. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20,703.
3. Braeways A, de Bruyn J, Helmerhorst F et al. 2005 Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices. Human Reproduction 20, 820-824.
4. Craft I, Flyckt S, Heeley G et al. 2005 Will removal of anonymity influence the recruitment of egg donors? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20, 325-329.
5. Fortescue E 2004 Gamete donation - where is the evidence that there are benefits in removing the anonymity of donors? A rejoinder to a patient's viewpoint. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20, 704-705.
6. Golombok S 2005 Unusual families. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20 (suppl. 1), 9-12.
7. Lilley D 2004 Disclosure: a threat to egg donation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 20, 705-706.
8. Lui S, Weaver S, Robinson J et al. 1995 A survey of semen donor attitudes. Human Reproduction 19, 234-238.
9. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R et al. 2005 School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns. Human Reproduction 20, 810-819.