A note on normal theory power calculation in SEM with data missing completely at random

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 245-262

  Dolan, Conor ^a   Van Der Sluis, Sophie ^a   Grasman, Raoul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MISSING COMPLETELY AT RANDOM (MCAR); LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST (LRT); MISSPECIFICATION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (SEM);

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL METHODS; VECTORS;

DATA ACQUISITION;

EID: 18444397785     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1202_4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). Amos for Windows: Analysis of moment structures. Version 3.5. Chicago: SmallWaters.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Azzelini, A. (1996). Statistical inference based on the likelihood. London: Chapman & Hall.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
5. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111-135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2002). The noncentral chi-square distribution in misspecified structural equation models: Finite sample results from a Monte Carlo simulation. Multivariate Behavior Research, 37, 1-36.
8. Dalgaard, P. (2002). Introductory statistics with R. New York: Springer.
9. Finkbeiner, C. (1979). Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing. Psychometrika, 44, 409-420.
10. Gold, M. S., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Treatment of missing data: A Monte Carlo comparison of RBHDI, iterative stochastic regression imputation, and expectation-maximization. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 319-355.
11. Harvey, A. C. (1993). Time series models (2nd ed.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
12. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Estimation and testing of simplex models. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 121-145.
13. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
14. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
15. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8 [Computer Software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
16. Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworth.
17. Lee, S.-Y. (1986). Estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychometrika, 51, 93-99.
18. Lei, P.-W., & Dunbar, S. B. (2004). Effects of score discreteness and estimating alternative model parameters on power estimation methods in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 20-44.
19. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326.
20. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
21. Muthén, B. O., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.
22. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599-620.
24. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (5th ed.). Richmond: Viriginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry.
25. R Development Core Team. (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
26. Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181-204). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). The power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
28. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
29. Schott, J. R. (1997). Matrix analysis for statistics. New York: Wiley.
30. Yuan, K.-H., & Hayashi, K. (2003). Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 93-110.
31. Yung, Y.-F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.