Level of functioning and recidivism risk among adolescent offenders

Adolescence

Volumn 40, Issue 157, 2005, Pages 23-32

  Shepherd, J Brad ^b   Green, Kenneth R ^a   Omobien, Edward O ^a  

^a Multi County Juvenile Attention System   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY CARE; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; MALE; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RISK FACTORS;

EID: 18444392722     PISSN: 00018449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andrews, D. A., Bonita, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
2. Bird, H. R. (1999). The assessment of functional impairment. In D. Schaffer, C. P. Lucas, & J. E. Richter (Eds.), Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology (pp. 209-229). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. J., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367-394.
4. Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427-439.
5. Crowe, A. (2000). Jurisdictional technical assistance package for juvenile corrections (Chapter 5). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice. Retrieved January 19, 2002, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/ojjdp/179194.pdf.
6. Dembo, R., Seeberger, W., Shemwell, M., Klein, L., Rollie, M., & Pacheco, K. (2000). Psychosocial functioning among juvenile offenders 12 months after family empowerment intervention. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32, 1-56.
7. Frank, S. J., Paul, J. S., Marks, M., & Van Egeren, L. A. (2000). Initial validation of the Functional Impairment Scale for Children and Adolescents. Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1300-1308.
8. Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B. Smith, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., & Hanley, J. H. (1993). Family preservation using multi-systemic treatment: Longterm follow-up to a clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2, 283-293.
10. Hodges, K. (1990, 1994 revision). Child and Adolescent Level of Functioning Scale. Ypsilannti, MI; Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology.
11. Hodges, K. (1999). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CA-FAS). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Hodges, K., & Kim, C. S. (2000). Psychometric study of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale: Prediction of contact with the law and poor school attendance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 287-297.
13. Hoge, R. D. (in press). The Youth Level of Service/Casemanagement Inventory (YLS/CMI). In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & J. Seagrave (Eds.), Handbook of mental health screening and assessment for juvenile justice. New York: Guildford.
14. Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996, August). The Youth Level of Service/Casemanagement Inventory: Description and evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
15. Hoge, R. D., Andrews, D. A., & Leschied, A. W. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Casemanagement Inventory. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
16. Howell, J. C. (Ed.) (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice. Retrieved March 19, 2004 from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/guide.pdf.
17. John, K., Gammon, G., Prusoff, B. A., & Warner, V. (1987). The Social Adjustment Inventory for Children and Adolescents (SAICA): Testing a new semistructured interview. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 898-911.
18. Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (1999). Risk and need assessment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
19. Lipsy, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analtic inquiry into treatment variability effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Quist, R. M., & Matshazi, D. G. M. (2000). The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS): A dynamic predictor of juvenile recidivism. Adolescence, 35, 181-190.