Public opinion and school desegregation in hartford, connecticut

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 68-80

  McMiller, Darryl L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444382247     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1066568000330210     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Balz, J. (1999, August 17). Many shrug at racial division: Poll of young Americans raises concerns about resegregation, but others say it's OK if it's a personal choice. The Los Angeles Times, p. Al.
2. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
3. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
4. Brittain, J. (1997). Why Sheff v. O'Neill is a landmark decision. Connecticut Law Review, 30,211-218.
5. Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, 17 Cal. 3d 280,551 P. 2d 28 (1976).
6. Fife, B. L. (1996). The Supreme Court and school desegregation since 1896. Equity & Excellence in Education, 29(2), 46-55.
7. Frahm, R. A. (1998, July 29). Education rather than integration: Study reveals Black parents want more emphasis on school quality. The Hartford Courant, p. Al.
8. Gillespie, M. (1999, September 27). Americans want integrated schools, but oppose busing. Gallup News Service [On-line]. Available: http://www.gal-lup.com/poll/releases/pr990927.asp
9. Green, R. (1997, June 5). Mixed reviews for legislature's response to Sheff decision. Hartford Courant, p. A10.
10. Green, R. (1998, March 6). Sheff case goes back to court: State must prove integration efforts. The Hartford Courant, p. A3.
11. Green, R. (1999, March 24). Ruling in Sheff case won't be appealed. The Hartford Courant, p. Al.
12. Hamilton, A. (1997, June 18). Sheff plaintiffs to take state back to court lawmakers defend their effort to meet desegregation order. The Hartford Courant, p. Al.
13. Jensen, R. M. (1997). Advancing education through education clauses of state constitutions. Bringham Young University Education and Law Journal, Spring, 1-44.
14. Lee, M. J. (1999). How Sheff revives Brown: Reconsidering desegregation's role in creating equal educational opportunity. New York University Law Review, 74,485-528.
15. Leibman, J. (1990). Desegregating politics: "All-out" school desegregation explained. Columbia Law Review, 1463-1605.
16. Moran, R. (1997). Milo's miracle. Connecticut Law Review, 29, 1079-1114.
17. Orfield, G. (1996). Turning back to segregation. In G. Orfield, S. E. Eaton, & The Harvard Project on School Desegregation (Eds.), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 1-22). New York: The New York Press.
18. Orfield, G. & Yun, J. T. (1999). Resegregation in American schools. Available from The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, 444 Gutman Library, 6 Appian Way, Cambridge, MA 02138.
19. Parker, D. (1999). Racial and ethnic isolation, post Sheffv. O'Neill. Equity & Excellence in Education, 32(2), 5-11.
20. Rossell, C. H. (1998). The convergence of Black and White attitudes on school desegregation issues. In N. Devins & D. M. Douglas (Eds.), Redefining Equality (pp. 120-138). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Stark, R. (1991). Education reform: Judicial interpretation of state constitutions' education finance provisions-adequacy vs. equality. Annual Survey of American Law, 609-680.
22. Themstrom, S. & Themstrom, A. (1997). America in Black and White: One nation indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.