Perfect pattern formation of neutral atoms in an addressable optical lattice

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Vala, J ^a,c   Thapliyal, A V ^b,c   Myrgren, S ^a   Vazirani, U ^b,c   Weiss, D S ^d   Whaley, K B ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LATTICE SITES; NEUTRAL ATOMS; OPTICAL LATTICES; SEQUENTIAL APPLICATIONS;

ATOMS; LATTICE CONSTANTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUANTUM THEORY; STATE ASSIGNMENT; TOPOLOGY;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 18444368379     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032324     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. I. H. Deutsch and P. J. Jessen, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1972 (1998).
2. D. Jaksch, H.-J. Briegel, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1975 (1999).
3. D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
4. R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982).
5. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, K. Shtengel, K. Walker, and Z. Wang, e-print quant-ph/0307511.
6. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 066401 (2005).
7. A. Yu. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 303, 2 (2003).
8. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
9. L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090402 (2003).
10. B. D. Hughes, Random Walks and Random Environments (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
11. G. Grimmet, Percolation (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
12. M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
13. D. van Oosten, P. van der Straten, and H. T. C. Stoof, Phys. Rev. A 63, 053601 (2001).
14. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Mansch, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
15. J. Preskill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 385 (1998).
16. M. D. Lukin, M. Fleschhauer, R. Côté, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
17. M. Saffman and T. G. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 66, 065403 (2002).
18. P. Rabl, A. Daley, P. Fedichev, J. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 110403 (2003).
19. R. Scheunemann, F. S. Cataliotti, T. W. Mansch, and M. Weitz, Phys. Rev. A 62, 051801 (2000).
20. S. L. Winoto, M. T. DePue, N. E. Bramall, and D. Weiss, Phys. Rev. A 59, R19 (1999).
21. D. Weiss, J. Vala, A. Thapliyal, S. Myrgren, U. Vazirani, and K. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 70, 040302 (2004).
22. B. Vaishnav and D. Weiss (unpublished).
23. B. Vaishnav (unpublished).
24. S. A. Rice and M. Zhao, Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics (Wiley Interscience, New York, 2000).
25. M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992).
26. D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259 (1998).
27. O. Mandel, M. Greiner, A. Widera, T. Rom, T. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 010407 (2003).
28. R. Kosloff, in Numerical Grid Methods and Their Application to Schrödinger's Equation, edited by C. Cerjan (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 175-194.
29. R. Kosloff, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 145 (1994).
30. R. Kosloff, in Dynamics of Molecules and Chemical Reactions, edited by R. E. Wyatt and J. Z. H. Zhang (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996), pp. 185-230.
31. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000).
32. We employ standard computer science notation that O(n) means scaling at most linear with n for large n.
33. The precise value is n - 1 but we ignore the constant for clarity and since we are more concerned with the scaling behavior.
34. The function ⌈x⌉ rounds up to the smallest integer greater than or equal to x, and the function ⌈x⌉ rounds down to the largest integer less than or equal to x.
35. 2 n] to the worst-case cost, which is negligible compared to the other terms.
36. d+1⌉, but for clarity and simplicity we ignore this. It only contributes an extra term of 2⌈log2 n⌉ to the worst-case cost, which is negligible compared to the other terms.
37. E. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. Chu, and D. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2631 (1987).
38. M. T. DePue, C. McCormick, S. L. Winoto, S. Oliver, and D. S. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2262 (1999).
39. N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, I. Protsenko, and P. Grangier, Nature (London) 411, 1024 (2001).
40. A. J. Kerman, V. Vuletić, C. Chin, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 439 (2000).
41. S. E. Hamann, D. L. Haycock, G. Klose, P. H. Pax, I. H. Deutsch, and P. S. Jessen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4149 (1998).
42. V. Vuletić, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5768 (1998).
43. D.-J. Han, S. Wolf, S. Oliver, C. McCormick, M. T. DePue, and D. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 724 (2000).
44. H. Perrin, A. Kuhn, I. Bouchoule, and C. Salomon, Europhys. Lett. 42, 395 (1998).
45. J. Vala, O. Dulieu, F. Masnou-Seeuws, P. Pillet, and R. Kosloff, Phys. Rev. A 63, 013412 (2001).
46. J. Vala and R. Kosloff, Opt. Express 8, 238 (2001).
47. O. Madelung, Introduction to Solld-State Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1978).
48. A. Imamoglu, D. D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D. P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).