[formula presented] monopoles, vortices, and the deconfinement transition in mixed action SU(2) gauge theory

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 9-

  Gavai, R V ^b  

^a HARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444365909     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.054512     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
2. R. V. Gavai, M. Grady, and M. Mathur, Nucl. Phys. B423, 123 (1994).
3. G. Bhanot and M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 24, 3212 (1981).
4. J. Engels, J. Fingberg, and M. Weber, Nucl. Phys. B332, 737 (1990).
5. M. Mathur and R. V. Gavai, Nucl. Phys. B448, 399 (1995);
6. R. V. Gavai and M. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 56, 32 (1997).
7. P. W. Stephenson, hep-lat/9604008.
8. L. Caneschi, I. G. Halliday, and A. Schwimmer, Nucl. Phys. B200, 409 (1982).
9. S. Cheluvaraja and H. S. Sharatchandra, hep-lat/9611001.
10. Saumen Datta and R. V. Gavai, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6618 (1998).
11. T. Blum, Nucl. Phys. B442, 301 (1995).
12. U. M. Heller, Phys. Lett. B 362, 123 (1995).
13. R. V. Gavai, Nucl. Phys. B448, 399 (1995).
14. I. G. Halliday and A. Schwimmer, Phys. Lett. 102B, 337 (1981).
15. Saumen Datta and R. V. Gavai, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034505 (1999).
16. In Ref. 6, a slight shift in the deconfinement transition line was obtained near the end of the bulk line in going from (Formula presented) to 8, unlike in Ref. 5. While this shift was interpreted in Ref. 6 as indicating a decoupling of bulk and deconfinement effects at (Formula presented), in our opinion, it was too small and is more likely to be due to finite size effects. In any case, the (Formula presented) deconfinement line was also seen to bend towards, and finally merge with, the bulk line. Clearly, there were substantial interference effects of bulk and deconfinement phenomena there too.
17. R. Savit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 453 (1980).
18. E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979).
19. R. V. Gavai and M. Mathur, Phys. Lett. B 458, 331 (1999).
20. A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988).
21. J. Engels, J. Fingberg, and D. E. Miller, Nucl. Phys. B387, 501 (1992).
22. M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3445 (1996).