Comments on: Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Illinois: Model sensitivity and implications [1] (multiple letters)

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2002, Pages 2263-2265

  Ames, Michael R ^a   Zemba, Stephen G ^a   Yamartino, Robert J ^b   Valberg, Peter A ^c   Green, Laura C ^a  

^a Cambridge Environmental Inc   (United States)

^b Integrals Unlimited   (United States)

^c GRADIENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITRATE; OZONE; SULFATE; SULFUR;

ACCURACY; AIR MONITORING; AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ATMOSPHERE; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; ERYTHROCYTE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; LETTER; LUNG ALVEOLUS CELL; NONHUMAN; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 18444364812     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00246-7     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Abt Associates Inc., 2000. The Particulate-Related Health Benefits of Reducing Power Plant Emissions. Clean Air Task Force, Boston, MA.
2. J. Fay D. Golomb S. Kumar Source apportionment of wet sulfate deposition in eastern North America Atmospheric Environment 19 11 1985 1773 1782
3. Freeman III, A. M., 2001. An Analysis of the Pataki Power Plant Proposal vs. Full Environmental Comparability Using the New York Externalities Cost Model. Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME.
4. J.F. Gamble PM2.5 and mortality in long-term prospective cohort studies cause-effect or statistical associations? Environmental Health Perspectives 106 1998 535 549
5. Green, L. C., Crouch, E. A. C., Lash, T. L., Ames, M. R., 2002. What's wrong with the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5)? Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, in press.
6. Krewski, D., Burnett, R.T., Goldberg, M.S., Hoover, K., Siemiatycki, J., Jerrett, M., Abrahamowicz, M., White, W.H., et al., 2000. Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MA.
7. Levy, J., 2001. Personal Communication of Model Input Data. Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Boston, MA.
8. J.I. Levy D. Spengler Modeling the benefit of power plant emission controls in Massachusetts Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 52 1 2002 5 18
9. Levy, J., Spengler, J. D., Hlinka, D., Sullivan, D., 2000. Estimated Public Health Impacts of Criteria Pollutant Air Emissions from Nine Fossil-Fueled Power Plants in Illinois. Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Boston, MA.
10. J.I. Levy J.D. Spengler D. Hlinka D. Sullivan D. Moon Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Illinois model sensitivity and implications Atmospheric Environment 36 2002 1063 1075
11. Maul, P. R., 1980. Atmospheric Transport of Sulfur Compound Pollutants. Central Electricity Generating Bureau MID/SSD/80/0026/R, Nottingham, England.
12. S.H. Moolgavkar E.G. Luebeck A critical review of the evidence on particulate air pollution and mortality Epidemiology 7 4 1996 420 428
13. Netherlands Aerosol Program (NAP), 2001. Discussion Document on Health Risks of Particulate Matter in Ambient Air. Final Draft. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
14. Phalen, R. F., 1998. Uncertainties relating to the health effects of particulate air pollution: the US EPA's particle standard. Toxicology Letters 96–97, 263–267.
15. J.S. Scire F.R. Robe M.E. Fernau R.J. Yamartino A User's Guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model (Version 5) 2000 Earth Tech, Inc Concord, MA
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1999. interagency workgroup on air quality modeling (IWAQM) phase 2 summary report and recommendations for modeling long range transport impacts, EPA-454-R-98-019.
17. P.A. Valberg A.Y. Watson Alternative hypotheses for PM associations with daily mortality and morbidity Inhalation Toxicology 10 1998 641 662
18. Venkatram, A., 1980. Estimation of turbulence velocity scales in the stable and unstable boundary layer for dispersion applications. In: Eleventh NATO-CCMS International Technical Meeting on Air Pollution Modeling and its Application, March 19–22, Los Angeles, CA.
19. S.S. Zilitinkevich On the determination of the height of the Ekman boundary layer Boundary Layer Meteorology 3 1972 141 145