A historical account of oiled wildlife care in California

Marine Ornithology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 59-64

  Newman, Scott H ^a,b   Ziccardi, Mike H ^a   Berkner, Alice B ^b   Holcomb, Jay ^b   Clumpner, Curt ^b   Mazet, Jonna A K ^a  

^a School of Veterinary Medicine   (United States)

^b International Bird Rescue Res Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Oil pollution; Oil spill; Oiled wildlife care; Rehabilitation; Seabird

Indexed keywords

OIL POLLUTION; OIL SPILL; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SEABIRD; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AVES;

EID: 1842865094     PISSN: 10183337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ALDRICH, J.W. 1938. Review of the problem of birds contaminated by oil and their rehabilitation. USDI Resource Publication 87, Washington, D.C. pp. 1-23.
2. ALDRICH, J.W. 1970 Review of the problem of birds contaminated by oil and their rehabilitation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 87, 23 pp.
3. ANDERSON, D.W., GRESS, F. & FRY, D.M. 1996. Survival and dispersal of oiled Brown Pelicans after rehabilitation and release. Marine Pollution Bulletin 32: 711-718.
4. ANDERSON, D.W., NEWMAN, S.H., KELLY, P.R., HERZOG, S. K. & LEWIS, K. P. 2000. An experimental soft-release of oil-spill rehabilitated American Coots (Fulica americana): I Lingering effects on survival, condition and behavior. Environmental Pollution 107: 285-294.
5. ANONYMOUS. 1919. Oil upon the waters. Gull 1: 9-11, 19-20, 23.
6. ANONYMOUS. 1920. Oil on the waters. Gull 2: 35-36.
7. BERKNER, A.B. 1977. Wildlife rehabilitation techniques: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pollution Response Workshop, St. Petersburg, FL. Environmental Contaminant Evaluation Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.: pp. 127-133.
8. BRYNDZA, H.E., FOSTER JR., J.P., McCARTNEY, J.H. & LOBER, J.C. 1995. Methodology for determining surfactant efficacy in removal of petrochemicals from feathers. In: Frink, L., Ball-Weir, K. & Smith, C. (Eds). Wildlife and oil spills: Response, research, and contingency planning. Sheridan Press Inc., Hanover, Pennsylvania: pp. 69-86.
9. CARTER, H.R., PAGE, G.W. & FORD, R.G. 1987. The importance of rehabilitation center data in determining the impacts of the 1986 oil spill on marine birds in central California. Wildlife Journal 10: 9-14.
10. CARTER, H.R. 1997. Oiled seabird rescue at the J.V. Fitzgerald Marine Reserve, San Mateo County, California, 1968-1995. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 20: 3-6, 13-14.
11. CARTER, H.R., FORD, R.G., HELM, R.C., KELLY, P.R. & DUVAIR, P. 1998. Twentieth century oil spills and seabird mortality in California, Oregon, and Washington. In: Proceedings of the Japan-U.S. symposium on oil spills and the protection of wildlife, 7 December 1997. Tokyo, Japan: Nippon Foundation: pp. 71-90.
12. CARTER, H.R. 2003. Oiled seabirds in California: an overview. Marine Ornithology 31: 1-7.
13. CARTER, H.R., LEE, V.A., PAGE, G.W., PARKER, M.W., FORD, R.G., SWARTZMAN, G., KRESS, S.W., SISKIN, B.R., SINGER, S.W. & FRY, D.M. 2003. The 1986 Apex Houston oil spill in central California: seabird injury assessments and litigation process. Marine Ornithology 31: 9-19.
14. DOROFF, A.A. & DeGANGE, A.R. 1994. Experiments to determine drift patterns and rates of recovery of sea otter carcass following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. NRDA Report, Marine Mammal Study No. 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
15. DRINKWATER, B., LEONARD, M. & BLACK, S. 1971. Santa Barbara's oiled birds. In: Straughan, D. (Ed.). Biological and oceanographical survey of the Santa Barbara Oil Spill. Volume I: Biology and Bacteriology. Los Angeles, California: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California: pp. 313-324.
16. FORD, R.G., G.W. PAGE, and H.R. CARTER, 1987. Estimating mortality of seabirds from oil spills. In: Proceedings of the 1987 Oil Spill Conference. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute: pp. 547-551.
17. FROST, K.J., LOWRY, L.F., SINCLAIR, E.H., VerHOEF, J.V. & McALLISTER, D.C. 1994. Impacts on distribution and productivity of harbor seals. In: Loghlin, T.R. (Ed.). Marine mammals and the Exxon Valdez. Academic Press, San Diego, California: pp. 97-118.
18. GARROT, R.A., EBERHART, L.L. & BURNS, D.M. 1993. Mortality of sea otters in Prince William Sound following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Marine Mammal Science 9: 343-359.
19. GOLIGHTLY, R.T., NEWMAN, S.H., CRAIG, E.N., CARTER, H.R. & MAZET, J.A.K. 2002. Survival and behavior of Western Gulls following exposure to oil and rehabilitation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 539-546.
20. HARTUNG, R. 1963. Ingestion of oil by waterfowl. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science 48: 49-55.
21. HARTUNG, R. 1964. Some effects of oil on waterfowl. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
22. th International Effects of Oil on Wildlife, October 23-24, Hamburg, Germany.
23. INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE RESEARCH CENTER. 1985. Rehabilitating oiled seabirds: a field manual. Burridge, J. & Kane, M. (Eds.)., American Petroleum Institute Publication No. 4407. Washington, D.C.
24. JESSUP, D.A. & LEIGHTON, T.E. 1996. Oil pollution and petroleum toxicity to wildlife. In: Hoff, G.L., Fairbrother, A., & Locke, L. (Eds). Non-infectious diseases of wildlife, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa: pp. 141-157.
25. LEIGHTON, T.E. 1991. The toxicity of petroleum oils to birds: An overview. In: The Effects of Oil on Wildlife: Research, Rehabilitation and General Concerns. The Oil Symposium, Herndon, Virginia: pp. 43-58.
26. LINCOLN, F.A. 1936. The effects of oil pollution on waterfowl. In: Proceedings of the North American Wildlife Conference: pp. 555-562.
27. MAZET, J.A.K., NEWMAN, S. H., GILARDI, K.V.K., TSENG, F.S., HOLCOMB, J.B. JESSUP, D.A. & ZICCARDI, M.H. 2002. Advances in oiled bird emergency medicine and management. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 16: 146-149
28. NASH, A.E.K., MANN, D.E. & OLSEN, P.G. 1972, Oil pollution and the public interest: a study of the Santa Barbara oil spill. University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies, Berkeley, California.
29. NEWMAN, S.H., ANDERSON, D.W., ZICCARDI, M. H., TRUPKIEWICZ, J. G., TSENG, F. S., CHRISTOPHER, M. M. & ZINKL, J. G. 2000. An experimental soft-release of oil-spill rehabilitated American Coots (Fulica americana): II. Effects on health and blood parameters. Environmental Pollution 107: 295-304.
30. th International Effects of Oil on Wildlife, October 23-24, Hamburg, Germany.
31. OFFICE OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. 2000. Wildlife Response Plan for California. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.
32. OILED WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK. 1998. Protocols for the care of oil-affected marine birds. Tseng, F.S., Mazet, J.K.A., Newman, S.H., Ziccardi, M.H., & White J. (Eds). Wildlife Health Center. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
33. OILED WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK. 2002. Legislative report. Wildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California
34. PAGE, G.W. & CARTER, H.R. 1986. Impacts of the 1986 San Joaquin Valley Crude oil spill on marine birds in central California. Unpublished report. Point Reyes Bird Observatory, Stinson Beach, California.
35. PALMER, R.H. 1921. A murre tragedy. Condor 23: 135.
36. PIATT, J.F. & FORD, R.G. 1996. How many seabirds were killed by the Exxon Valdez oil spill? American Fisheries Society Symposium 18: 712-719.
37. SHARP, B.E. 1996. Post-release survival of oiled, cleaned seabirds in North America. Ibis 138: 222-228.
38. SMAIL, J., AINLEY, D.G. & STRONG, H. 1972. Notes on birds killed in the 1971 San Francisco oil spill. California Birds 3: 25-32.
39. STEDMAN, D.F. 1952. Reported in a letter from O.H. Hewett to F.B. Schuler, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Boston, Massachusetts. June 30.
40. STRAUGHAN, D. 1970. Ecological effects of the Santa Barbara oil spill. In: Santa Barbara oil symposium. 16-18 December 1970. Santa Barbara. California: University of California. Marine Science Institute: pp. 173-182.
41. STRAUGHAN, D. 1971. Oil pollution and seabirds. In: Straughan, D. (Ed.). Biological and oceanographical survey of the Santa Barbara Oil Spill 1969-1970. Volume 1: Biology and Bacteriology. Los Angeles, California: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California: pp. 307-312.
42. TICEHURST, N.F. 1938. Oiled birds resorting to fresh water. British Birds 31: 345-355.
43. WATERTON, C. 1832. On birds using oil from glands for the purpose of lubricating the surface of the plumage. Magazine of Natural History 5: 412-415.
44. WILLIAMS, A.S. 1942a. Saving oiled seabirds. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 1-7.
45. WILLIAMS, A.L. 1942b. Treatment of an oiled murre. Gull 24: 11-12.
46. WILLIAMS, A.S., BRUNDAGE, S.C., ANDERSON, E., HARRIS, J.M. & SMITH, D.C. 1978. Saving oiled seabirds, a manual for cleaning and rehabilitating oiled waterfowl. Berkner, A.B. & Hay, K.G. (Ed). American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C.
47. WILLIAMS, A.S. 1986. Saving oiled seabirds, Kane, M. (Ed)., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C