Prescribing, Professional Identity, and Costs

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 148-150

  Wiggins, Jack G ^a,b,c,e   Wedding, Danny ^a,d  

^a MISSOURI INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b Psychological Development Center   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d University of Missouri   (United States)

^e School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842864989     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.2.148     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2003). Guidelines for prescriptive authority, Retrieved September 3, 2003, from http://www.asppb.org/Members/pag.htm
2. DeNelsky, G. Y. (1996). The case against prescriptive privileges for psychologists. American Psychologist, 51, 207-211.
3. Feldman, S., Bachman, J., Cuffel, B., Friesen, B., & McCabe, J. (2003). Advanced practice psychiatric nurses as a treatment resource: Survey and analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 30, 479-492.
4. Hayes, S., & Heiby, E. (1996). Psychology's drug problem: Do we need a fix or should we just say no? American Psychologist, 51, 198-207.
5. Heiby, E. M. (2002). Concluding remarks on the debate about prescriptive privileges for psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 709-722.
6. Reiss-Brennan, B., Stuart, G. W., & Betts, V. T. (2003). Commentary from the field. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 30, 492-494.
7. Robiner, W. N., Bearman, D. L., Grove, W. M., Colon, E., Armstrong, J., & Mareck, S. (2002). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A looming health hazard? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 231-248.