Psychology Licensing Board Disciplinary Actions: The Realities

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 170-178

  Van Horne, Barbara A ^a,b  

^a University of Wisconsin ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842864983     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.2.170     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Adams, J. M. (2001). On your side: Protecting your mental health practice from litigation. New York: Mimesis Books.
2. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (1996). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America, Montgomery, AL: Author.
3. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (1997). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America. Montgomery, AL: Author.
4. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (1998). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America. Montgomery, AL: Author.
5. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (1999). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America. Montgomery, AL: Author.
6. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2000a). Enforcing codes of conduct (Part I). Montgomery, AL: Author.
7. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2000b). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America. Montgomery, AL: Author.
8. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2001). Handbook of licensing and certification requirements for psychologists in North America. Montgomery, AL: Author.
9. Collins, T., & Garwood, B. (1998, February). An investigation of complaint procedures of ASPPB member jurisdictions: Preliminary data and analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, Long Beach, CA.
10. DeNelsky, G. Y. (2001, July/August). Ten years of psychology through the eyes of The National Psychologist: Licensing. The National Psychologist, p. 7B.
11. Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States. (2002). Summary of 2001 board actions. Austin, TX: Author.
12. Gottlieb, M. C. (1990). Accusation of sexual misconduct: Assisting in the complaint process. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 455-461.
13. Kirkland, K., & Kirkland, K. L. (2001). Frequency of child custody evaluation complaints. A survey of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 171-174.
14. Montgomery, L. M., Cupit, B. E., & Wimberley, T. K. (1999). Complaints, malpractice, and risk management: Professional issues and personal experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 402-410.
15. O'Connor, M. F. (2001). On the etiology and effective management of professional distress and impairment among psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 345-350.
16. Parsons, J. P., & Wincze, J. P. (1995). A survey of client-therapist sexual involvement in Rhode Island as reported by subsequent treating therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 171-175.
17. Peterson, M. B. (2001). Recognizing concerns about how some licensing boards are treating psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 339-340.
18. Pope, K. S. (1990). Therapist-patient sex as sex abuse: Six scientific, professional, and practical dilemmas in addressing victimization and rehabilitation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 227-239.
19. Pope, K. S., & Bajt, T. R. (1988). When laws and values conflict: A dilemma for psychologists. American Psychologist, 43, 828.
20. Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47, 397-411.
21. Ranslow, B. (2001a, February). Experiences in standardization at the national level: A standardized approach to disciplinary action and reporting. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, Biloxi, MS.
22. Ranslow, B. (2001b). The Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank. The Register Report, 25, 36-37.
23. Reaves, R. P. (1998, February). Disciplinary data. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, Long Beach, CA.
24. Reuters Health Information. (2002). Small fraction of US physicians account for most of malpractice cases. Reuters Medical News [On-line], Retrieved September 26, 2002, from http://www.medscape.com/
25. Welch, B. L. (2001). Caution: State licensing board ahead. Insight: Safeguarding Psychologists Against Liability Risks, 1, 1-6.
26. Wendling, T. (1999a, December 8). Penalty sought for therapists who seduce, The Plain Dealer, pp. 1-B, 5-B
27. Wendling, T. (1999b, December 5). A Plain Dealer special investigation: Disciplined psychologists face few consequences. The Plain Dealer [On-line], Retrieved December 7, 1999, from http://www.cleveland .com/news/pdnews/metro/ ca05psy.ssf
28. Wendling, T. (1999c, December 7). Psychology board goes slow. The Plain Dealer [On-line], Retrieved December 7, 1999, from http://www.cleveland.com/ news/pdnews/nietro/ca05psy.ssf
29. Wendling, T. (1999d, December 6). Regulators spare rod, try to heal psychologists. The Plain Dealer, pp. 1A, 6-A, 7-A.
30. Williams, M. H. (2000). Victimized by "victims": A taxonomy of antecedents of false complaints against psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 75-81.
31. Williams, M. H. (2001). The question of psychologists' maltreatment by state licensing boards: Overcoming denial and seeking remedies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 341-344.