Consumer and service determinants of completion of a consumer self-rating outcome measure

Australasian Psychiatry

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 48-54

  Trauer, Tom ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c St Vincent's Mental Health Service   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cosumer; Outcome measurement; Psychiatry; Self rating

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AUSTRALIA; COMMUNITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSUMER; DATA ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT;

AGE FACTORS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MENTAL DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); VICTORIA;

EID: 1842861875     PISSN: 10398562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1039-8562.2003.02059.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Trauer T. Issues in the assessment of outcome in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 32: 337-343.
2. Graham C, Coombs T, Buckingham B, Eagar K, Trauer T, Callaly T. The Victorian Mental Health Outcomes Measurement Strategy. Consumer Perspectives on Future Directions for Outcome Self-Assessment Report of the Consumer Consultation Project. Victoria: Department of Human Services, 2001.
3. Eisen SV, Grob MC, Dill DL. Outcome measurement: tapping the patient's perspective. In: Mirin SM, Gossett JT, Grob MC, eds. Psychiatric Treatment: Advances in Outcome Research. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1991; 213-235.
4. Eagar K, Buckingham B, Coombs T et al. Outcome Measurement in Adult Area Mental Health Services: Implementation Resource Manual. Melbourne: Department of Human Services Victoria, 2000.
5. Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council National Mental Health Working Group. National Outcomes and Casemix Collection. Technical Specification of State and Territory Reporting Requirements for the Outcomes and Casemix Components of 'Agreed Data' under National Mental Health Information Development Funding Agreements. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, 2002.
6. Eisen SV, Leff HS, Schaefer E. Implementing outcome systems: lessons from a test of the BASIS-32 and the SF-36. Journal of Behavioral Health Service and Research 1999; 26: 18-26.
7. Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry 1976; 33: 1111-1115.
8. Trauer T, Callaly T. Concordance between mentally ill clients and their case managers using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Australasian Psychiatry 2002; 10: 24-28.
9. Graham C, Coombs T, Buckingham W, Eagar K, Trauer T, Callaly T. Consumer Perspectives of Future Directions for Outcome Self-Assessment Report of the Consumer Consultation Project. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, 2001.
10. Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SBG, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11-18.
11. Buckingham W, Burgess P, Solomon S, Pirkis J, Eagar K. Casemix Classification of Mental Health Services. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, 1998.
12. Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1994; 45: 242-247.
13. Callaly T, Trauer T, Hantz P. HBL. HoNOS, BASIS-32 and LSP16. Geelong: Barwon Health, 2000.
14. Callaly T, Trauer T, Hantz P. Integration of outcome measures into clinical practice. Australasian Psychiatry 1998; 6: 188-190.
15. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO, 1993.
16. Trauer T. Analysis of outcome measurement data from the four Victorian 'Round One agencies. Melbourne (unpublished report) 2003.
17. StataCorp. State Statistical Software. Release 8.0. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 2003.
18. Dickerson FB. Assessing clinical outcomes: the community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 897-902.
19. Goldman N, Lin I-F, Weinstein M, Lin Y-H. Evaluating the quality of self-reports of hypertension and diabetes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003; 56: 148-154.
20. Eisen SV, Dickey B, Sederer LI. A self-report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients' involvement in treatment. Psychiatric Services 2000; 51: 349-353.
21. Allenby A, Matthews J, Beresford J, McLachlan S. The application of computer touch-screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting. European Journal of Cancer Care 2002; 11: 245-253.
22. Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time, benefits, and patient preference. Quality of Life Research 2001; 10: 15-21.
23. Greist JH, Klein MJ, Erdman HP et al. Comparison of computer-and interviewer-administered versions of the diagnostic interview schedule. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1987; 38: 1304-1311.
24. Epstein JF, Barker PR, Kroutil LA. Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly 2001; 65: 529-549.
25. Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1997; 38: 581-586.