A review of a multiprofessional cancer course

European Journal of Cancer Care

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 82-90

  Thain, C ^a   Wyatt, D ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b CLATTERBRIDGE CENTRE FOR ONCOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allied health professionals; Curriculum; Development; Education; Multiprofessional

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 1842857642     PISSN: 09615423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00304.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beattie A. (1987) Making a curriculum work. In: The Curriculum in Nursing Education (eds Allan P. & Jolley M.). Croom-Helm, London.
2. Dean J. (2000) The nature and purpose of evaluation. In: Teaching and Assessing in Nursing Practice: an Experiential Approach (eds Nicklin P.J. &. Kenworthy N.J. Bailliere Tindall, London.
3. Department of Health (1992) Health of the Nation: A Strategy for Health in England. HMSO, London.
4. Department of Health (1995) A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services: Report of the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer (Chairs: K Calman and D Hine). Department of Health, London.
5. Department of Health (2000a) The NHS Cancer Plan. Department of Health, London.
6. Department of Health (2000b) Improving the Quality of Cancer Services. Health Service Circular HSC 2000/021. NHS Executive, London.
7. Glen S. (1991) Planning the ethics component of a curriculum. In: Curriculum Planning in Nursing Education (eds Pendleton S. &. Myles A.). Edward Arnold, London.
8. International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC) (1991) A Core Curriculum for a Post-Basic Course in Palliative Nursing. Haigh and Hochland, Manchester.
9. Lawton D. (1983) Curriculum Studies and Educational Planning. Hodder and Stoughton, London.
10. Lawton D. (1984) Cultural analysis and curriculum evaluation. In: Evaluating the Curriculum in the Eighties (ed. Skilbeck M.). Hodder and Stoughton, London.
11. Millar B. (1998) The struggle to keep up with Calman-Hine. Nursing Times 94 (35), 62-64.
12. NHS Executive North-West (1998) Pathways in Cancer Care. The University of Liverpool, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology.
13. Odro A. (1992) A pictorial approach to course evaluation. Nurse Education Today 12, 57-60.
14. Parahoo K. (1991) Student-controlled evaluation - a pilot study. Nurse Education Today 11, 220-224.
15. Pateman B. &. Jinks A. (1999) 'Stories' or 'Snapshots'? A study directed at comparing qualitiative and quantitative approaches to curriculum evaluation. Nurse Education Today 19, 62-70.
16. Pendleton S. (1991) Curriculum planning in nursing education: towards the year 2000. In: Curriculum Planning in Nursing Education (eds Pendleton S. &. Myles A.). Edward Arnold, London.
17. Quinn F.M. (2000) The Principles and Practice of Nurse Education, 4th edn. Chapman &. Hall, London.
18. Sconce C. & Howard J. (1994) Curriculum evaluation - a new approach. Nurse Education Today 14, 280-286.
19. Skilbeck M. (1984) School-based Curriculum Development. Harper & Row, London.
20. Stenhouse L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Heinemann, London.
21. Ward D. (1997) The Workforce Planning Implications of the Calman-Hine Report for Nursing and Allied Health Professionals. University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
22. Wood C. & Ward J. (2000) Cancer Services Education Review. South-West London and Epsom Education Consortium.