Sexual compatibility between two types of Hylocerus (Cactaceae);Compatibilidad sexual entre dos tipos de Hylocerus (Cactaceae)

Revista de Biologia Tropical

Volumn 51, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 699-705

  Castillo M, Roberta ^a   Livera M, Manuel ^b   Brechú F, Alicia E ^c   Márquez Guzmán, Judith ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE QUINTANA ROO   (Mexico)

^b Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cactaceae; Compatibility system; Hylocereus; Pitahaya; Pollination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CACTACEAE; FRUIT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MEXICO; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; TIME;

CACTACEAE; FRUIT; MEXICO; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

CACTACEAE; HYLOCEREUS; HYLOCEREUS UNDATUS; LEPTOCEREUS QUADRICOSTATUS;

EID: 1842855253     PISSN: 00347744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aneja, M., T. Gianfagna, E. Ng & I. Badillo. 1994. Carbon dioxide treatment partially overcomes self-incompatibility in cacao genotype. HortSci. 29: 15-17.
2. Baker, R.P., K.H. Hasenstein & M. S. Zavada. 1997. Hormonal changes after compatible and incompatible pollination in Theobroma cacao. L. HortSci. 32: 1231-1234.
3. Benerji I. & S. Sen. 1955. A contribution to the cytology and embryology of Hylocereus undatus (Haw) Br. & R. Bull. Bot. Soc. Berg. 8: 18-23.
4. Breubaker, J.L. 1957. Pollen cytology and self-incompatibility systems in plants. J. Hered. 48: 271-277.
5. Cálix De D., H. 1996. I simposio internacional sobre pitayas y frutos afines. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, México. 83 p.
6. Castillo M.R., H. Cálix De D. & A. Rodríguez C. 1996. Guía técnica para el cultivo de pitahaya. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad de Quintana Roo, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. 158 p.
7. Denney, J.O. 1992. Xenia, includes metaxenia. HortSci. 27: 722-728.
8. Ganders, F.R. 1976. Self-incompatibility in the Cactaceae. Cactus Succulent J. (G. Britain). 38: 38-40.
9. Gupton, G.L. & J.M. Spiers. 1994. Interspecific and intraspecific pollination effects in Rabbiteye and Southern Highbush Blueberry. HortSci. 29: 324-326
10. Haring, V., J.E. Gray, B.A. McClure, M.A. Anderson & A.E. Clarke. 1990. Self-incompatibility: a self-recognition system in plants. Science 250: 937-941.
11. Haung, Y. H., C.E. Johnson, G.A. Lang & M.D. Sundberg. 1997. Pollen sources influences on early fruit growth of Southern Highbush Blueberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122: 625-629.
12. Helsop-Harrison, J. 1975. Incompatibility and the pollen-stigma interaction. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 26: 403-425.
13. Hill-Cottingham, D.G. & R.R. Williams. 1967. Effect of time of application of fertilizer nitrogen on the growth flower development and fruit set of maiden apple trees, var. Lord Lambourne, and on the distribution of total nitrogen within the trees. J. Hort. Sci. 42: 319-338.
14. Kahn, T.L., C.J. Adams & M.L. Arpaia. 1994. Paternal effects on fruit and seed characteristics in cherimoya (Annona cherimoya Mill.). Scientia Hort. 59: 11-25.
15. Lichtenzveig, J., S. Abbo, A. Nerd, N. Tel-Zur & Y. Mizrahi. 2000. Cytology and mating systems in the climbing cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus. Am J. Bot. 87: 1058-1065.
16. Matton, D.P., N. Nass, A.E. Clarke & E. Newbigin. 1994. Self-incompatibility: How plants avoid illegitimate offspring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 1992-1997.
17. Newbigin, E., M.A. Anderson & A.E. Clarke. 1993. Gametophytic self-incompatibility systems. Plant Cell. 5: 1315-1324.
18. Ramírez M. & F. De J. 1999. Caracterización y compatibilidad en pitahaya Hylocereus sp. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias en Horticultura. Universidad Autónoma, Chapingo, México.
19. Schopfer, Ch.R., M.E. Nasrallh & J.B. Nasrallh. 1999. The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 286: 1697-1699.
20. Sutherland, S. 1986. Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants. Evolution 40: 117-128.
21. Swingle, W.T. 1928. Metaxenia in the date palm, possibly a hormone action by the embryo or endosperm. J. Hered. 19: 257-268.
22. The-hui, K. & A.G. McCubbin. 1997. Molecular and biochemical bases of gametophytic self-incompatibility in Solanaceae. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 35: 171-176.
23. Tromp, J. & O. Borsboom, 1994. The effect of autumn and spring temperature on fruit set and the effective pollination period in apple and pear. Scientia Hort. 60: 23-30.
24. Weiss J., A. Nerd & Y. Mizrahi. 1994a. Flowering behavior and pollination requirements in climbing cacti with fruit crop potential. HortSci. 29: 1487-1492.
25. Weiss J., A. Nerd & Y. Mizrahi. 1994b. Flowering and pollination requirements in Cereus peruvianus cultivated in Israel. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 42: 149-159.