E-tailers versus retailers. Which factors determine consumer preferences

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 685-695

  Keen, Cherie ^a   Wetzels, Martin ^b   de Ruyter, Ko ^c   Feinberg, Richard ^d  

^a FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer decision making; E retailing; On line consumer behavior; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842854585     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00360-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams D.A. Nelson R.R. Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication MIS Q 16 1992 227-247 Summer
2. Addelman S. Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments Technometrics 4 1962 21-58 February
3. Ajzen I. Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior 1980 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behaviors 1988 Dorsey Press Chicago, IL
5. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 50 1991 179-211
6. Aldenderfer M.S. Blashfield R.K. Cluster analysis 1984 Sage Publications Newbury Park, CA
7. Bagozzi R.P. Kimmel S.K. A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal-directed behaviors Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 34 1995 437-461
8. Balasubramanian S. Mail versus mall: a strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers Mark. Sci. 17 1998 181-195
9. Bateson J.E.G. Self-service consumer: an exploratory study J. Retail. 61 1985 49-76 March
10. Blair E. Sampling issues in trade area maps drawn from shopper surveys J. Mark. 47 1983 98-106 Winter
11. Boston Consulting Group. The state of online retailing, November 1998.
12. Bush A.J. Hair J.F. An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method J. Mark. Res. 22 1985 158-167
13. Carroll J.D. Green P.E. Psychometric methods in marketing research: Part I. Conjoint analysis J. Mark. Res. 32 1995 385-391 November
14. Dabholkar P.A. Role of affect and need for interaction in on-site service encounters Adv. Consum. Res. 19 1992 563-569
15. Dabholkar P.A. Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality Int. J. Res. Mark. 13 1996 29-51
16. Davis F.D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, 1986.
17. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Q 13 1989 319-340
18. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38 1993 475-487
19. Davis F.D. Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments Int. J. Hum-Comput. Stud. 45 1996 19-45
20. Davis F.D. Bagozzi R.P. Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models Manage. Sci. 35 1989 982-1003 August
21. Ernst, Young. Internet shopping: a special report. Report presented at the National Retail Federation Conference, New York, January 1998.
22. Ernst, A. Young A. The Second Annual Internet Shopping Study. Report presented at the National Retail Federation Conference, New York, January 1999.
23. Fishbein M. Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior 1975 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
24. Forrester Research, 1998. Retail's growth spiral. [On-line]. Available: www.nrf.com/ecommerce/forrester/1998/reports/2642/document.htm
25. Forrester Research, 1999. On-line retail strategies report. [On-line]. Available: www.forrester.com/research
26. Green P.E. Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook J. Consum. Res. 5 1978 103-123
27. Green P.E. Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice J. Mark. 4 1990 3-19
28. Green P.E. Krieger A.M. Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis J. Mark. 55 1991 20-31 October
29. Hill T. Smith N.D. Mann M.F. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case of computers J. Appl. Psychol. 72 1987 307-313 February
30. Johnson R.B. Estimating an evaluation utilization model using conjoint measurement and analysis Eval. Rev. 19 1995 313-339 March
31. Louviere J.J. Analyzing decision making: metric conjoint analysis 1988 Sage Publications Newbury Park, CA
32. Madden T.J. Ellen P.S. Ajzen I. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18 1992 3-9
33. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior Inf. Syst. Res. 2 1991 173-191
34. Moore G.C. Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation Innov. Syst. Res. 2 1991 192-222 March
35. Moore W.L. Semenik R.J. Measuring performances with hybrid conjoint analysis: the impact of a different number of attributes in the master design J. Bus. Res. 16 1988 261-274
36. Nataraajan R. Prediction of choice in a technically complex, essentially intangible, highly experiential, and rapidly evolving consumer product Psychol. Mark. 10 1993 367-379 May
37. Nielsen Media Research and Commerce Net, Shoppers filling on-line carts with books, computer stuff. (October 8, 1999, press release). [On-line]. Available: www.nielsenmedia.com/news
38. Punj G. Stewart D.W. Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application J. Mark. Res. 20 1983 134-148 May
39. Sheppard B.H. Hartwick J. Warshaw P.R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research J. Consum. Res. 15 1988 325-343 December
40. Sudman S. Improving the quality of shopping center sampling J. Mark. Res. 17 1980 423-431 November
41. Surprenant C.F. Solomon M.R. Predictability and personalization in the service encounter J. Mark. 51 1987 86-96 February
42. Taylor S. Todd P. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions Int. J. Res. Mark. 12 1995 137-155 February
43. Ward J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58 1963 236-244
44. Wiley J.B. Low J.T. A Monte Carlo simulation study of two approaches for aggregating conjoint data J. Mark. Res. 20 1983 405-416