|
Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 167-193
|
To be or not to be: is that the question? Wrongful life and misconceptions
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABORTION;
ARTICLE;
COMPENSATION;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
FRANCE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HANDICAPPED CHILD;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
NEWBORN;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PREGNANCY;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ABORTION, EUGENIC;
COMPENSATION AND REDRESS;
DISABLED CHILDREN;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEMALE;
FRANCE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PREGNANCY;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
|
EID: 1842845065
PISSN: 09670742
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042306 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (0)
|