The context, measures and outcomes of psychosocial care interventions in long-term health care for older people

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-44

  Mackenzie, Ann E ^a   Lee, Diana T F ^b   Ross, Fiona M ^c  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elders; Interventions; Outcomes; Psychosocial; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABLED PERSON; ELDERLY CARE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HONG KONG; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LONG TERM CARE; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARD;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HONG KONG; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LONG-TERM CARE; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 1842842020     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2003.00456.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harwood RH, Prince M, Mann A, Ebrahim S. Associations between diagnosis, impairments, disability and handicap in a population of elderly people. International Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 27 : 261-268.
2. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health . Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
3. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps . Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
4. Wade DT. Recent advances in rehabilitation. British Medical Journal 2000; 320 : 1385-1388.
5. Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48 : 1173-1187.
6. Thompson SC, Sobolew-Shubin A, Graham MA, Janigian AS. Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Social Science and Medicine 1989; 28 : 239-247.
7. Mackenzie AE, Chang AM. Predictors of quality of life following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24 : 259- 265.
8. Levenson JL. Psychosocial interventions in chronic medical illness: an overview of outcome research. General Hospital Psychiatry 1992; 14 (Suppl. 6): 43S-49S.
9. Rosenberg M, Schooler C. Global self-esteem and specific self esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review 1995; 60 : 141-156.
10. Heatherton TF, Polivy J. Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991; 60 : 895-910.
11. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation. Measurement of PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 1979; 60 : 145-154.
12. Chang AM, Mackenzie AE. State self-esteem following stroke. Stroke 1998; 29 : 2325-2328.
13. Kivnick HQ, Murray SV. Vital involvement. An overlooked source of identity in frail elders. Journal of Ageing and Identity 1997; 3 : 205-223.
14. Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GAM, Beelen A, de Groot IJM, de Haan RJ. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16 : 27-35.
15. Bellemy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stit LW. Validation study of WOMAC. Journal of Rheumatology 1988; 15 : 1835-1840.
16. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al . Validating the SF36 Health Questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal 1992; 305 : 160- 164.
17. Niccassio PM, Wallston KA, Callahan LF, Herbert M, Pincus T. The measurement of helplessness in rheumatoid arthritis: the development of the Arthritis Helplessness Index. Journal of Rheumatology 1985; 12 : 462-467.
18. Bowling A. Measuring Disease . Buckingham: Open University Press, 1993.
19. Victor C, Ross F, Axford J. Capturing lay perspectives in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of Clinical Evaluation. (in press).
20. Glass TA, Dym B, Greenberg S, Rintell D, Roesch C, Berkman LF. Psychosocial interventions in stroke. Families in recovery from stroke trial (FIRST). American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2000; 70 : 169-181.
21. Lee TFD, Lee FK, Mackenzie AE, Ho NLR. Effects of a care protocol on care outcomes in elderly nursing home patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002; 50 : 870- 876.
22. Goldberg DP, Hiller VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 1979; 9 : 139- 145.
23. Wade DT. Social context as a focus for rehabilitation [Editorial]. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15 : 459-461.
24. Sidani S, Braden CJ. Evaluating Nursing Interventions . Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1998.
25. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GAM, de Jong B, de Groot IJM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the impact on participation and autonomy. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 411-419.
26. Lee TFD, Woo J, Mackenzie AE. The cultural context of adjusting to nursing home life: Chinese elders' perspectives. The Gerontologist 2002; 42: 667-675.
27. Kane RA. Goals of home care: Therapeutic, compensatory, either, or both?. Journal of Ageing and Health 1999; 3: 299- 321.
28. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health, 2001.