Experimental hybridization between two recently diverged species of tropical sea urchins, echinometra mathaei and echinometra oblonga

Invertebrate Reproduction and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-14

  Rahman, M Aminur ^a   Uehara, Tsuyoshi ^a   Pearse, John s ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE RYUKYUS   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Echinometra; Hybridization; Reproductive isolation; Sea urchins; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ECHINOIDEA; ECHINOMETRA; ECHINOMETRA MATHAEI; ECHINOMETRA OBLONGA;

EID: 1842833529     PISSN: 07924259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07924259.2004.9652569     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amy, R. L., 1983. Gamete sizes and developmental time tables of five tropical sea urchins. Bull. Mar. Sci., 33:173–176.
2. Arakaki, Y., and Uehara, T., 1991. Biology of Echinodermata Edited by:Yanagi-sawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N., and Motokawa, T., 105–111. Rotterdam:A.A. Balkema. Physiological adaptation and reproduction of the four types of Echinometra mathaei (Blainville). In
3. Arakaki, Y., and Uehara, T., 1999. Morphological comparison of black Echinometra individuals among those in the Indo-west Pacific. Zool. Sci., Japan, 16:551–558.
4. Arakaki, Y., Uehara, T., and Fagoone, I., 1998. Comparative studies of the genus Echinometra from Okinawa and Mauritius. Zool. Sci., Japan, 15:159–168.
5. Aslan, L. M., and Uehara, T., 1997. Hybridization and Fl back-crosses between two closely related tropical species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Invert. Reprod. Develop, 31:319–324.
6. Bartlett, M. S., 1937. Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. Suppl. J.R. Stat. Soc, 4:137–170.
7. Geyer, L. B., and Palumbi, S. R., 2003. Reproductive character displacement and the genetics of gamete recognition in tropical sea urchins. Evolution, 57:1049–1060.
8. Howard, D. J, Reece, M., Gregory, P. G., Chu, V., and Cain, M. L., 1998. “ The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms ”. In Endless Forms:Species and Speciation Edited by:Howard, D. J., and Berlocher, S. H., 279–288. New York:Oxford University Press.
9. Landry, C., Geyer, L. B, Arakaki, Y., Uehara, T., and Palumbi, S. R., 2003. Recent speciation in the Indo-West Pacific:Rapid evolution of gamete recognition and sperm morphology in cryptic species of sea urchin. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270:1839–1847.
10. Lessios, H. A., and Pearse, J. S., 1996. Hybridization and introgression between Indo-Pacific species of Diadema. Mar. Biol, 126:715–723.
11. Lessios, H. A., Kessing, B. D., and Pearse, J. S., 2001. Population structure and speciation in tropical seas:Global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution, 55:955–975.
12. Levitan, D. R., 1998a. Does Bateman's principle apply to broadcast-spawning organisms?. Egg traits influence in situ fertilization rates among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution, 52:1043–1056.
13. Levitan, D. R., 1998b. “ Sperm limitation, gamete competition, and sexual selection in external fertilizers ”. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection Edited by:Birkhead, T. R., and Moller, A. P., 175–217. San Diego:Academic Press.
14. Matsuoka, N., and Hatanaka, T., 1991. Molecular evidence for the existence of four sibling species within the sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei in Japanese waters and their evolutionary relationships. Zool. Sci., Japan, 8:121–133.
15. Metz, E. C., and Palumbi, S. R., 1996. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13:397–406.
16. Metz, E. C., Yanagimachi, H., and Palumbi, S. R., 1991. Biology of Echinodermata Edited by:Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N., and Motokawa, T., 131–137. Rotterdam:A.A. Balkema. Gamete compatibility and reproductive isolation of closely related Indo-Pacific sea urchins, genus Echinometra. In
17. Metz, E. C., Kane, R. E., Yanagimachi, H., and Palumbi, S. R., 1994. Fertilization between closely related sea urchins is blocked by incompatibiliies during sperm-egg attachment and early stags of fusion. Biol. Bull, 187:23–34.
18. Miller, R. L., 1985. Demonstration of sperm chemotaxis in the Echinodermata. J. Exp. Zool, 234:383–414.
19. Miller, R. L., 1997. Specificity of sperm chemotaxis among Great Barrier Reef shallow-water holothurians and ophiuroids. J. Exp. Zool., 279:189–200.
20. Nishihira, M., Sato, Y., Arakaki, Y., Tsuchiya, M., Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N., and Motokawa, T., 1991. 91–104. Rotterdam:A.A. Balkema.
21. O'Rand, M. G., 1988. Sperm-egg recognition and barriers to interspecies fertilization. Gamete Res., 19:315–328.
22. Osanai, K., 1974. Interspecific hybridization of sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus nudus Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Bull. Mar. Biol. Station of Asamushi, 15:37–45.
23. Palumbi, S. R., 1996. What can molecular genetics contribute to marine biogeography?. An urchin's tale. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 203:75–92.
24. Palumbi, S. R., 1998. “ Species formation and the evolution of gamete recognition loci ”. In Endless Forms:Species and Speciation Edited by:Howard, D. J., and Berlocher, S. H., 271–278. New York:Oxford University Press.
25. Palumbi, S. R., and Metz, E. C., 1991. Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol. Biol. Evol., 8:227–239.
26. Palumbi, S. R., Grabowsky, G., Duda, T., Geyer, L., and Tachino, N., 1997. Speciation and population genetic structure in tropical Pacific sea urchins. Evolution, 51:1506–1517.
27. Pearse, J. S., and Cameron, R. A., 1991. “ Echinodermata:Echinoidea ”. In Reproduciton of Marine Invertebrates, Vol. VI, Echinoderms and Lophophorates Edited by:Giese, A. C., Pearse, J. S., and Pearse, V. B., 513–662. Pacific Grove, CA:Boxwood Press.
28. Pennington, J. T., 1985. The ecology of fertilization of echinoid eggs:the consequences of sperm dilution of echinoid eggs, adult aggregation and synchronous spawning. Biol. Bull, 169:417–430.
29. Rahman, M. A., and Uehara, T., 2001. Induction of metamorphosis and substratum preference in four sympatric and closely related species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Zool. Stud., Taiwan, 40:29–43.
30. Rahman, M. A., Uehara, T., and Asian, L. M., 2000. Comparative viability and growth of hybrids between two sympatric species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Aquaculture, 183:45–56.
31. Rahman, M. A., Uehara, T., and Pearse, J. S., 2001. Hybrids of two closely related tropical sea urchins (Genus Echinometra):Evidence against postzygotic isolating mechanisms. Biol. Bull, 200:97–106.
32. Rice, W. R., 1998. “ Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation ”. In Endless Forms:Species and Speciation Edited by:Howard, D. J., and Berlocher, S. H., 261–270. New York:Oxford University Press.
33. Shingaki, M., and Uehara, T., 1984. Chromosome studies in the several species of sea urchin from Okinawa. Zool. Sci., Japan, 1 1008 (abstract in Japanese)
34. Tsuchiya, M., and Nishihira, M., 1984. Ecological distribution of two types of sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei (Blainville), on Okinawan reef flat. Galaxea, 3:131–143.
35. Tsuchiya, M., and Nishihira, M., 1985. Agonistic behaviour and its effect on the dispersion pattern in the two types of the sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei (Blainville). Galaxea, 4:37–48.
36. Tsukahara, J., Uehara, T., and Tsukashima, M., 1996. Comparative study of the spines of Echinometra in Palau, Okinawa and Kagoshima. Kagoshima Univ. Res. Center S. Pac., Occas. Papers, 30:61–68.
37. Uehara, T., 1990. Speciation in Echinometra mathaei. Iden., 44 (7):47–53. (in Japanese)
38. Uehara, T., and Shingaki, M., 1985. Taxonomic studies in the sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei from Okinawa. Zool. Sci., Japan, 2 1009
39. Uehara, T., and Taira, K., 1987. Heteromorphyic chromosomes in sea urchin, Type B of Echinometra mathaei, from Okinawa. Zool. Sci., Japan, 4 1001
40. Uehara, T., Shingaki, M., and Taira, K., 1986. Taxonomic studies in the sea urchin, genus Echinometra from Okinawa and Hawaii. Zool. Sci., Japan, 3 1114
41. Uehara, T., Asakura, H., and Arakaki, Y., 1990. “ Fertilization blockage and hybridization among species of sea urchins ”. In Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction Edited by:Hoshi, M., and Yamashita, O., 305–310. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
42. Uehara, T., Shingaki, M., Taira, K., Arakaki, Y., and Nakatomi, H., 1991. Biology of Echinodermata Edited by:Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N., and Motokawa, T., 119–129. Rotterdam:A.A. Balkema. Chromosome studies in eleven Okinawan species of sea urchins, with special reference to four species of the Indo-Pacific Echinometra. In
43. Vacquier, V. D., Swanson, W. J., and Hellberg, M. E., 1995. What have we learned about sea urchin sperm bindin?. Dev. Growth Diff., 37:1–10.
44. Ward, G. E., Brokaw, C. J., Garbers, D. L., and Vacquier, V. D., 1985. Chemotaxis of Arbacia punctulata spermatozoa to resact, a peptide from the egg jelly layer. J. Cell Biol., 101:2324–2329.
45. Zar, J. H., 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
46. Zigler, K. S., and Lessios, H. A., 2003. 250 million years of bindin evolution. Biol. Bull., 205:8–15.