Randomized controlled clinical trial on satisfaction with resilient denture liners among edentulous patients

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 236-240

  Kimoto, Suguru ^a   Kitamura, Manabu ^a   Kodaira, Maria ^a   Yamamoto, Shirou ^a   Ohno, Yousuke ^a   Kawai, Yasuhiko ^a   Kawara, Misao ^a   Kobayashi, Kihei ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; SILICONE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTURE LINERS; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SILICONES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 1842830925     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347-1352.
2. Parr GR, Rueggeberg FA. In vitro hardness, water sorption, and resin solubility of laboratory-processed and autopolymerized long-term resilient denture liners over one year of water storage. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:139-144.
3. Olan Rodriguez L, Minah GE, Driscoll CF. Candida albicans colonization of surface-sealed interim soft liners. J Prosthodont 2000;9:184-188.
4. Price C, Waters MG, Williams DW, Lewis MA, Stickler D. Surface modification of an experimental silicone rubber aimed at reducing initial candidal adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:122-128.
5. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley, 1986:46-47.
6. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:400-405.
7. Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, Pudwill ML, Taylor DT. A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:176-179.
8. Hills M, Armitage P. The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979;8:7-20.
9. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 1999;319:670-674.
10. Little R, Yau L. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics 1996;52:1324-1333.
11. Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, Kawamura M, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J Dent Res 2002;81:123-128.
12. Feine JS, de Grandmont P, Boudrias P, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: Choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res 1994;73:1105-1111.
13. Wright PS. A three year longitudinal study of denture soft lining materials in clinical use. Clin Mater 1986;1:281-289.
14. Burns DR, Linger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Giglio JA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II-Patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:364-369.
15. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000;79:1659-1663.
16. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:446-450.
17. Triandis HC. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebr Symp Motiv 1980;27:195-259.