Design and ergonomics. methods for integrating ergonomics at hand tool design stage

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-23

  Marsot, Jacques ^a   Claudon, Laurent ^a  

^a INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE ET DE SÉCURITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Design; Ergonomics; Method; QFD; Triz

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FRANCE; HAND INJURY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FRANCE; HAND INJURIES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 1842830679     PISSN: 10803548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2004.11076591     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Armstrong TJ, Foulke JA, Joseph BS, Goldstein SA. Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982;43: 103–16.
2. Vanbergeijk E. Selection of power tools and mechanical assists, ergonomic considerations of hand- held power tools for control of occupational hand and wrist injuries In: Hand tools: ergonomics issues in evaluation and selection, July 22–23, 1996. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan; 1996. p. 1–5.
3. Tichauer ER, Gage H. Ergonomic principles basic to hand tool design. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1977;38: 622–34.
4. Aptel M. Etude dans une entreprise de montage d’appareils électroménagers des facteurs de risque professionnels du syndrome du canal carpien. Documents pour le Médecin du Travail 1993;54(2): 149–64.
5. Aptel M, Claudon L, Marsot J. Integration of ergonomics into hand tool design: principle and presentation of an example. JOSE 2002;8(1); 107–15.
6. Theureau J, Pinsky L. Paradoxe de l’ergonomie de conception et logiciel informatique. Revue des Conditions de Travail 1984;9: 25–31.
7. Vadcard P. Aide a la programmation de l’utilisation des outils en conception de produit [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1996.
8. Sagot JC, Gouin V, Gomes S. Ergonomics in product design: safety factor. Safety Science 2003;41: 137–54.
9. Laprie JC. Guide de la sureté de fonctionnement. Toulouse, France: CEPADUES Editions; 1996.
10. Aoussat A. La pertinence en innovation: nécessité d’une approche plurielle [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1990.
11. Jouffroy D, Ciccotelli J, Martin P. Contribution of a distributed design method to the safety of numerically controlled woodworking machine. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems—IMS Europe 1998, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 15–17, 1998. Lausanne, Switzerland: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; 1998. p. 449–58.
12. Roussel B. Ergonomie en conception de produits: Proposition d’une méthode centrée sur la formulation de principes de solutions ergonomiques dans le processus interdisciplinaire de conception de produits [doctoral dissertation]. Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers; 1996.
13. Association Franęaise Pour l’Analyse de la Valeur (AFAV). Exprimer le besoin—application de la démarche fonctionnelle. Paris, France: Association Franęaise de Normalisation (AFNOR); 1989.
14. Claudon L. Ergonomic hand tool design: interview of users. In: Podgórski D, Karwowski W, editors. ERGON-AXIA 2000, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Ergonomics and Safety for Global Business Quality and Productivity. Warszawa, Poland: Central Institute for Labour Protection; 2000. p. 123–26.
15. Akao Y. QFD—Prendre en compte les besoins du client dans la conception du produit. Paris, France: Association Franęaise de Normalisation (AFNOR); 1993.
16. Daetz D, Barnard B, Norman R. Customer integration—the Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Leader’s guide for decision making. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 1995.
17. Tsuda Y. QFD models for concurrent engineering development processes of automobiles. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 1995;3(3): 213–20.
18. Sivaloganathan S, Evbuomwan NFO, Jebb A. The development of a design system for concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 1995;3(4): 257–69.
19. Haapalainen M, Kivisto-Rahnasto J, Mattila M. Ergonomic design of non-powered hand tools: an application of quality function deployment (QFD). Occupational Ergonomics 1999/2000;2(3): 179–89.
20. Madu CN. House of quality in a minute. Fairfield, CT, USA: CHI; 2000.
21. Radwin RG. Pistol grip power tool handles and trigger size effect on grip exertions and operator preferences. Human Factors 1993; 35(3): 551–69.
22. Lewis WG, Narayan CV. Design and sizing of ergonomic handles for hand tools. Appl Ergon 1977;24(5): 351–6.
23. Claudon L. Ergonomic hand tool design project [final report]. Nancy, France: French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS); 2002. In French.
24. Altshuller G. And suddenly the inventor appeared. Worcester, MA, USA: Technical Innovation Center; 1996.
25. Cogu G. Methodologie d’innovation: la resolution de problemes créatifs. In: Actes du Colloque “Modélisation des processus de conception”. Nancy, France: PRIMECA; 1999. p. 1–20.
26. Zusman A, Zlotin B. Overview of creative methods. The TRIZ Journal 1999;July. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/07/e/index.htm
27. Cavalucci D. Etat de l’art, limites et perspectives devolution de TRIZ. In: Actes du colloque “Journées analyse de la valeur, Méthode TRIZ et Capitalisation d’Experence”. Paris, France: Association Franęaise Pour l’Analyse de la Valeur (AFAV); 1999. p. 1–20.
28. Kowalick J. Problem solving systems: what’s next after TRIZ? The TRIZ Journal 1999;March. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/03/b/index.htm
29. Lee L. The complete guide to sharpening. Newtown, CT, USA: Taunton Press; 1994.
30. Richardot F. Industrial statements on the application of voice of customer. In: Proceedings of the conference “Product and Service Design for Customers—VOC and QFD”. Epinal, France; 1999. pp. 17–40. In French.
31. Terninko J. The QFD, TRIZ and Taguchi connection: customer-driven robust innovation. The TRIZ Journal 1998;January. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1998/01/b/index.htm
32. Wu A. Integration of QFD, TRIZ, and robust design: overview et luggage case study. Livonia, MI, USA: American Supplier Institute; 1997.
33. León-Rovira, N, Aguayo H. a new model of the conceptual design process using QFD/FA/TRIZ. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1998/07/d/index.htm
34. Martin C, Bocquet JC. Conception intégrée. Interopérativité des méthodes: AF, QFD, AMDEC dans le cadre du projet PIRAMID. In: 6eme Colloque national sur la conception mécanique intégrée. La Plagne, France: PRIMECA; 1999. p. 247–54.
35. Hasan R, Bernard A, Ciccotelli J, Martin P. Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation. Safety Science 2003;41: 155–79.