Art Teachers' Views of National Curriculum Art: A repertory grid analysis

Educational Studies

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 165-176

  Rayment, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842790370     PISSN: 03055698     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713664267     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. ADAMS-WEBBER, J.R. (1979) Personal Construct Theory, Concepts and Applications (Toronto, John Wiley).
2. ADDISON, N. (1999) Who's afraid of signs and significations? Defending semiotics in the Secondary Art and Design Curriculum, Journal of An and Design Education, 18(1), pp. 33-39.
3. ASHLEY, J. (1991) Personal constructs an alternative approach? Support for Learning, 6(2), pp. 71-76.
4. ATKINSON, D. (1999) Broadside 2. A Critical Reading of the National Curriculum for Art in the Light of Contemporary Theorisations of Subjectivity (Birmingham, Article Press).
5. BANNISTER, D. & MAIR, J.M.M. (1968) The Evaluation of Personal Constructs (London, Academic Press).
6. BARRETT, M. (1979) Art Education: a strategy for course design (London, Heinemann Educational).
7. DFEE (1998) Teachers Meeting the Challenge of Change (London, HMSO).
8. HALL, E. (1978) Using Personal Constructs [University of Nottingham School of Education (Rediguide 9)].
9. HUGHES, A. (1997) The evisceration of art education, Journal of An and Design Education, 16(2), pp. 117-126.
10. KELLY, G.A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs (New York, Norton).
11. LAKIN, S. & WELLINGTON, J. (1994) Who will teach the 'nature of science'?: teachers' views of science and their implications for science education, International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), pp. 175-190.
12. MILES, M. (1999) Post-modernism and the Art Curriculum: A new subjectivity, Journal of Art and Design Education, 18(1), pp. 27-32.
13. POPE, M.L. & DENICOLO, P. (1993) The art and science of constructivist research in teacher thinking, Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5/6) pp. 529-544.
14. POPE, M.L. & KEEN, T.R. (1981) Personal Construct Psychology and Education (London, Academic Press).
15. RAYMENT, T. (1999) Assessing National Curriculum Art, AT2, knowledge and understanding: a report of a small-scale project in one school, at Key Stage 3, Journal of An and Design Education, 18(2), pp. 189-194.
16. ROSS, M. (1995) National Curriculum Art and Music, Journal of Art and Design Education, 14(3), pp. 271-276.
17. SALMON, P. (1988) Psychology for Teachers. An Alternative Approach (London, Hutchinson).
18. SLATER, P. (Ed.) (1977) Dimensions of Intrapersonal Space (London, John Wiley).
19. SWIFT, J. (1999) Broadside 2, Preface, in: D. ATKINSON Broadside 2. A Critical Reading of the National Curriculum for An in the hight of Contemporary Theorisations of Subjectivity p. 1 (Birmingham, Article Press).
20. SWIFT, J. & STEERS, J. (1999) A manifesto for art in schools, Journal of An and Design Education, 18(1), pp. 7-13.
21. WETTZ, M. (1956) The role of theory in aesthetics, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XV(1), pp. 27-35.
22. YORKE, D.M. (1978) Repertory grids in educational research: some methodological considerations, British Educational Research Journal, 4(2), pp. 63-74.