Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 331-336

  Strange, David M ^a   Sue Scale, N ^b   Nunn, Martha E ^c   Strange, Malcolm ^a  

^a Wheat Ridge ^*  (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMOCRESOL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFANT; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL PULP CALCIFICATION; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORMOCRESOLS; HUMANS; INFANT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MOLAR; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; PULPOTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT RESORPTION; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 1842788633     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barefield DJ. A comparison of two methods of application of formocresol in pulpotomies in primary teeth in monkeys. MS Thesis, Baylor College of Dentistry, 1985.
2. Hicks JM, Barr ES, Flaitz CM. Formocresol pulpotomies in primary molars: A radiographic study in a pediatric dentistry practice. J Pedo 10:331-339, 1986.
3. Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 22:192-199, 2000.
4. Rolling I, Thylstrup A. A 3-year clinical followup study of pulpotomized primary molars treated with the formocresol technique. Scand J Dent Res 83:47-53, 1975.
5. Berger JE. Pulp tissue reaction to formocresol and zinc oxide eugenol. J Dent Child 32:13-28, 1965.
6. Morawa AP, Straffon LH, Han SS, Corpron RE. Clinical evaluation of pulpotomies using dilute formocresol. J Dent Child 42:360-363, 1975.
7. Verco PJW, Allen KR. Formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth. J Int Ass Dent Child 15:51-55, 1984.
8. Glass RL, Zander HA. Pulpal healing. J Dent Res 2:97-107, 1949.
9. Hume WR. The pharmacological and toxicological properties of zinc oxide-eugenol. JADA 113:789-791, 1986.
10. Watts A, Paterson RC. pulpal response to zinc oxide-eugenol cement. Inter Endo J 20:82-86, 1987.
11. Beaver HA, Kopel HM, Sabes WR. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol cement on a formocresolized pulp. J Dent Child 35:22-30, 1968.
12. Willard RM. Radiographic changes following formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child 43:414-415, 1976.
13. Fuks AB, Bimstein E. Clinical evaluation of diluted formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth of school children. Pediatr Dent 3:321-324, 1981.
14. Lachmann E, Whelan M. The roentgen diagnosis of osteoporosis and its limitations. Radiology 26:165-177, 1936.