Viable methods for evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 326-334

  Sharma, Manoj ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b Walden University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CASE STUDY; COMMUNITY CARE; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REVIEW;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842788246     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280410001662923     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Resolution on disability, prevention and rehabilitation (A29.68) Geneva: WHO, 1976.
2. Thomas M, Thomas MJ. A discussion on the shifts and changes in community based rehabilitation in the last decade. Neurological Rehabilitation and Neural Repair 1999; 13: 185-189.
3. Thomas M, Thomas MJ. A discussion on some controversies in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal 2002; 13: 1-4.
4. Wirz S, Thomas M. Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programmes: A search for appropriate indicators. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2002; 25: 163-171.
5. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research. Principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1999.
6. O'Toole B. A community based rehabilitation programme for pre-school disabled children in Guyana. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1988; 11: 323-334.
7. Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999; 21: 459-468.
8. Morse JM, Swanson J, Kuzel AJ. The nature of qualitative evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
9. Sharma M. Qualitative research methods. In: KE Berg, RW Latin (eds) Essentials of modern research methods in health, physical education, and recreation. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2004.
10. Yin RK. Case study research, design, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
11. Stake RE. Case studies. In: NK Denzin, YS Lincoln (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994; 236-247.
12. Sharma M, Deepak S. A brief case study of community-based rehabilitation programme in Mongolia. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 2002; 13: 11-18.
13. Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A. (eds) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
14. Kivela SL. Problems in intervention and evaluation. A case report of a community-based rehabilitation and activation programme for the elderly and disabled. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1985; 3: 137-140.
15. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
16. Yoon SS, Byles J. Perceptions of stroke in the general public and patients with stroke: A qualitative study. British Medical Journal (BMJ) 2002; 324: 1065-1068.
17. Lopez JM, Lewis JA, Boldy DP. Evaluation of a Philippine community based rehabilitation programme. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2000; 12: 85-89.
18. Gilmore GD, Campbell MD. Needs assessment strategies for health education and health promotion. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark, 1996.
19. Reed J, Pearson P, Douglas B, Swinburne S, Wilding H. Going home from hospital - an appreciative inquiry study. Health & Social Care in the Community 2002; 10: 36-45.
20. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning. An educational and ecological approach. 3rd edn. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.
21. Tandan R, Brown LD. Organization building for rural development: An experiment in India. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 1981; 17: 172-189.
22. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, 1970.
23. Sharma M, Deepak S. A participatory evaluation of community-based rehabilitation programme in North Central Vietnam. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 352-358.
24. Kuipers P, Kendall E, Hancock T. Developing a rural community-based disability service: (I) service framework and implementation strategy. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2001; 9: 22-28.
25. Kuipers P, Foster M, Carlson G, Moy J. Classifying client goals in community-based ABI rehabilitation: A taxonomy for profiling service delivery and conceptualizing outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 154-162.
26. Finkenflugel HJ, Van Maanen V, Schut W, Vermeer A, Jelsma J, Moyo A. Appreciation of community-based rehabilitation by caregivers of children with a disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 255-260.
27. Evans PJ, Zinkin P, Harpham T, Chaudury G. Evaluation of medical rehabilitation in community-based rehabilitation. Social Science and Medicine 2001; 53: 333-348.
28. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.