Decision-making in state lotteries: Half now or all of it later?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 965-970

  Baker, Forest ^a,b   Johnson, Matthew W ^a   Bickel, Warren K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842787551     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196559     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CHAPMAN, G. B., & WINQUIST, J. R. (1998). The magnitude effect: Temporal discount rates and restaurant tips. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 119-123.
2. CLOTFELTER, C. T., & COOK, P. J. (1989). Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & MCFADDEN, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25, 715-723.
4. JOHNSON, M. W., & BICKEL, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129-146.
5. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
6. KIRBY, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54-70.
7. KIRBY, K. N., & MARAKOVIĆ, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100-104.
8. LOEWENSTEIN, G., & PRELEC, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573-597.
9. LOGUE, A. W., & ANDERSON, Y. D. (2001). Higher-education administrators: When the future does not make a difference. Psychological Science, 12, 276-281.
10. MAZUR, J. E. (1986). Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 67-77.
11. MAZUR, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: Vol. V. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. RACHLIN, H., BROWN, J., & CROSS, D. (2000). Discounting in judgments of delay and probability. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 145-159.
13. RACHLIN, H., CASTROGIOVANNI, A., & CROSS, D. (1987). Probability and delay in commitment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 347-353.
14. RACHLIN, H., & GREEN, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15-22.
15. RACHLIN, H., LOGUE, A. W., GIBBON, J., & FRANKEL, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33-45.
16. RACHLIN, H., RAINERI, A., & CROSS, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233-244.
17. ROTTER, J. B. (1954). Social learning & clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.