Development of highway-in-the-sky displays for flight-path guidance: History, performance results, guidelines

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 21-24

  Beringer, Dennis B ^a  

^a FAA Civil Aeromedical Inst   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRPORT RUNWAYS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; HELICOPTERS; MILITARY AIRCRAFT; MILITARY AVIATION; PERSONNEL TRAINING; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

COMMAND GUIDANCE INDICATORS; GENERAL AVIATION (GA); PRIMARY FLIGHT DISPLAY (PFD);

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 1842786857     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120004401306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Barrows, A. K., Enge, P., Parkinson, B. W. & Powell, J. D. (1995). Flight tests of a 3-D perspective-view glass-cockpit display for general aviation. Paper presented at the Institute of Navigation GPS-95 meeting, Palm Springs, CA: September 12-15.
2. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 57-62.
3. Brooks, P. E. (1998). The promise of four-dimensional flight displays. Flight Deck International '98, pp. 6-12.
4. Ellis, S. R., McGreevy, M. W. and Hitchcock, R. J. (1987). Perspective traffic display format and airline pilot traffic avoidance. Human Factors, 29, 371-382.
5. Etherington, T.J. (1999). Highway in the sky literature review and recommendations. Cedar Rapids, IA: Rockwell-Collins internal report.
6. Grunwald, A.J. (1984). Tunnel display for four-dimensional fixed-wing aircraft approaches. Journal of Guidance, 7(3), 369-377.
7. Jensen, R.S. (1981). Prediction and quickening in perspectiveflight displays for curved landing approaches. Human Factors, 23(3), 355-364.
8. Reising, J.M., Liggett, K.K., Kustra, T.W., Snow, M.P., Hartsock, D.C. and Barry, T.P. (1998). Evaluation of pathway symbology used to land from curved approaches with varying visibility conditions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1-5.
9. Roscoé, S.N. (1951). Flight by periscope: I. Performing an instrument flight pattern; the influence of screen size and image magnification. University of Illinois Bulletin, 48(55).
10. Roscoe, S. N. (1968). Airborne displays for flight and navigation. Human Factors, 10, 321-322.
11. Theunissen, E. (1993). A primary flight display for four-dimensional guidance and navigation: influence of tunnel size and level of additional information on pilot performance and control behavior. Proceedings of the AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, 140-146.
12. Theunissen, E. (1997). Integrated design of a man-machine interface for 4-D navigation, ISBN 90 407 1406 1.
13. Warner, D. A. (1979). Flight path displays. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Tech. Report AFFDL-TR-79-3075.
14. Wickens, C.D., Haskell, Il, & Harte, K. (1989). Perspective format for a primary flight display. Tech. Rpt. ARL-89-2/Boeing-89-I. Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab.
15. Wickens, C.D. (1995). Integration of navigational information for flight. University of Illinois Aviation Research Laboratory, Savoy, IL: Technical Report ARL-95-11/NASA-95-5.