Optimal fleet conversion policy from a life cycle perspective

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 229-249

  Kim, Hyung Chul ^a   Ross, Marc H ^a   Keoleian, Gregory A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollutant emissions; Greenhouse gas; High emitter; Life cycle assessment; Vehicle scrappage

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DETERIORATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FLEET OPERATIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIFE CYCLE; SALES; VEHICLES;

ACCUMULATING MILEAGE; OPTIMAL FLEET CONVERSION;

TRANSPORTATION;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; EMISSION CONTROL; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842784526     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberini A. Harrington W. McConnell V. Determinants of participation in accelerated vehicle-retirement programs RAND Journal of Economics 26 1995 93-112
2. Austin, S., Ross, M., 2001. History of emissions reductions: Normal emitters in FTP-type driving. Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE, 2001-01-0229. Warrendale
3. Binder A.K. Ward's Automotive Yearbook 2000 2000 Ward's Reports Inc. Detroit
4. Bohn J. Scrappage suggests car demand Automotive News 24 1992 32
5. California Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. On-Road Emissions Model Technical Documentation. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento
6. 2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: As assessment using the POLES model Energy Policy 27 1999 585-601
7. Davis, S., 2001. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 21, US DOE: Center for Transportation Analysis, National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
8. Deysher B. Pickrell D. Emissions reductions from vehicle scrappage programs Transportation Research Record 1587 1997 121-127
9. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, 1999. Cleaner Cars: Fleet Renewal and Scrappage Schemes, European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris
10. Environmental Defense Fund and General Motors Corporation, 1998. Emissions Reduction Crediting: A Clean Air Act Economic Incentive Policy Proposal for Retiring High-Emitting Vehicles. Environmental Defense Fund and General Motors Corporation, Washington, DC
11. Energy Information Administration, 2001. Annual Energy Outlook 2001 with Projections to 2020, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
12. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. National Air Quality and Emissions Report. Washington, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, EPA-450/4-92-023
13. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Update of Fleet Characterization Data for Use in MOBILE6; Final Report, EPA420-P-98-016, Washington, DC.
14. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999a. Fleet Characterization Data for MOBILE6: Development and Use of Age Distributions, Average Annual Mileage Accumulation Rates and Projected Vehicle Counts for Use in MOBILE6, Washington, EPA420-P-99-011, Washington, DC
15. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999b. Regulatory Announcement, EPA420-F-99-010, Washington, DC
16. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends 1975 through 2000, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) EPA, EPA420-R00-008, Washington, DC
17. Hahn R.W. An economic analysis of scrappage RAND Journal of Economics 26 1995 222-242
18. Keoleian, G.A., Lewis, G., Coulon, R.B., Camobreco, V.J., Teulon, H.P., 1998. LCI modeling challenges and solutions for a complex product system: A mid-sized automobile. Total Life Cycle Conference, SAE International, Paper No. 982169, Graz
19. Kim, H.C., Keoleian, G.A., 2002. Vehicle Replacement Policy Using Life Cycle Optimization Modeling. Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
20. Murty K.G. Linear Programming 1983 John Wiley - Sons, Inc. New York
21. Office for the Study of Automotive Transportation, 2000. Delphi X: Forecast and Analysis of the North American Automotive Industry for 2004 and 2009, Volume 1 Technology. Office for the Study of Automotive Transportation, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, UMTRI-2000-3-1, Ann Arbor
22. 2 emission reductions Energy Policy 24 1996 875-887
23. Ross, M., Goodwin, R., Watkins, R., Wang, M.Q., Wenzel, T.,1995. Real-World Emissions from Model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 Passenger Cars. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington DC
24. Ross, M., Wenzel, T., 1998. Life Time Emissions due to Malfunctioning of Emissions Controls. The TRB Workshop on Air Quality Impacts of Conventional and Alternative Fuel Vehicles, Ann Arbor
25. Small K.A. Kazimi C. On the costs of air pollution from motor vehicles Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 29 1995 7-32
26. Stoffer H. CAFE debate: Should government pay to replace dirty old vehicles? Automotive News 7 2002 39
27. Sullivan, J.L., Williams, R.L., Yester, S., Cobas-Flores, E., Chubbs, S.T., Hentges, S.G., Pomper, S.D., 1998. Life Cycle Inventory of a Generic US Family Sedan Overview of Results USCAR AMP Project. Total Life Cycle Conference, SAE International, Paper No. 982160, Graz
28. US Congress, 1992. Retiring Old Cars: Programs to Save Gasoline and Reduce Emissions. Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-E-536, Washington, DC
29. Wang, M.Q., Santini, D.J., 1994. Estimation of Monetary Values of Air Pollutant Emissions in Various US Areas, Argonne National Laboratory, CONF-950193-1, Argonne
30. Wee B.V. Moll H.C. Dirks J. Environmental impact of scrapping old cars Transportation Research Part D 5 2000 137-143
31. Weiss, M.A., Heywood, J.B., Drake, E.M., Schafer, A., AuYeung, F.F., 2000. On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies. Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA EL 00-003, Cambridge, Mass