Whole-tree silvic identifications and the microsatellite genetic structure of a red oak species complex in an Indiana old-growth forest

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2228-2237

  Aldrich, Preston R ^a   Parker, George R ^a   Michler, Charles H ^a   Romero Severson, Jeanne ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORESTRY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; MORPHOLOGY; POPULATION STATISTICS;

GENETIC STRUCTURE; HYBRIDIZATION;

TIMBER;

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; OLD-GROWTH FOREST;

EMBRYOPHYTA; QUERCUS PALUSTRIS; QUERCUS RUBRA; QUERCUS SHUMARDII;

EID: 1842766313     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x03-160     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aldrich, P.R., Michler, C.H., Sun, W., and Romero-Severson, J. 2002. Microsatellite markers for northern red oak (Fagaceae: Quercus rubra). Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2: 472-474.
2. Aldrich, P.R., Jagtap, M., Michler, C.H., and Romero-Severson, J.A. 2003. Amplification of North American red oak microsatellite markers in European white oaks and Chinese chesnut. Silvae Genet. In press.
3. Burger, W.C. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon, 24: 45-50.
4. Edwards, S.V., and Beerli, P. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution, 54: 1839-1854.
5. Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics, 5: 164-166.
6. Fowells, H.A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 271.
7. Guttman, S.I., and Weigt, L.A. 1989. Electrophoretic evidence of relationships among Quercus (oaks) of eastern North America. Can. J. Bot. 67: 339-351.
8. Harlow, W.M., Haraar, E.S., Hardin, J.W., and White, F.M. 1996. Textbook of dendrology. 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
9. Hokanson, S.C., Isebrands, J.G., Jensen, R.J., and Hancock, J.F. 1993. Isozyme variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 1349-1357.
10. Jensen, R.J. 1977. A preliminary numerical analysis of the red oak complex in Michigan and Wisconsin. Taxon, 26: 399-407.
11. Jensen, R.J. 1988. Assessing patterns of morphological variation of Quercus spp. in mixed-oak communities. Am. Midl. Nat. 120: 120-135.
12. Jensen, R.J. 1994. Quercus rubra dans le sous-genre Erythrobalanus: systematique, origine et hybridation. In Le chêne rouge d'Amerique. Edited by J. Timbal, A. Kremer, N. le Gof, and G. Nepveu. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris. pp. 61-74.
13. Jensen, R.J., and Eshbaugh, W.H. 1976. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization of Quercus. I. Populations of restricted areal distribution and low taxonomic diversity. Syst. Bot. 1: 1-10.
14. Jensen, R.J., DePiero, R., and Smith, B.K. 1984. Vegetative characters, population variation and the hybrid origin of Quercus ellipsoidalis. Am. Midl. Nat. 111: 364-370.
15. Jensen, R.J., Hokanson, S.C., Isebrands, J.G., and Hancock, J.F. 1993. Morphometric variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: evidence of hybridization between Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 1358-1366.
16. Kashani, N., and Dodd, R.S. 2002. Genetic differentiation of two California red oak species, Quercus parvula var. shreveii and Q. wislizeni, based on AFLP genetic markers. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184. pp. 417-426.
17. Laughlin, K. 1963. Quercus x riparia Laughlin Kansas City oak. Phytologia, 9: 101-107.
18. Laughlin, K. 1964. Quercus x columnaris Laughlin Caldwell oak. Phytologia, 9: 488-495.
19. Lewis, P.O., and Zaykin, D. 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.0 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors over the internet. Available from http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/ software.html [cited 2003].
20. Little, E.L. 1980. The Audubon Society field guide to North American trees: eastern region. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
21. Manos, P.S., and Fairbrothers, D.E. 1987. Allozyme variation in populations of six northeastern American red oaks (Fagaceae: Quercus subg. Erythrobalanus). Syst. Bot. 12: 365-373.
22. Morsink, W.A.G., and Pratt, P.D. 1984. Shumard Oak, Quercus shumardii, in Essex County, Ontario. Can. Field-Nat. 98: 470-478.
23. Mountain, J.L., and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1997. Multilocus genotypes, a tree of individuals, and human evolutionary history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61: 705-718.
24. Muir, G., Fleming, C.C., and Schlotterer, C. 2000. Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature (London), 405: 1016.
25. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
26. Palmer, E.J. 1942. The red oak complex in the United States. Am. Midl. Nat. 27: 732-740.
27. Palmer, E.J., and Steyermark, J.A. 1935. Quercus x mutabilis Palmer & Steyerm. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 22: 521.
28. Pamilo, P., and Nei, M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 568-583.
29. Parker, G.R., and Leopold, D.J. 1983. Replacement of Ulmus americana L. in a mature east-central Indiana woods. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 110: 482-488.
30. Parker, G.R., Leopold, D.J., and Eichenberger, J.K. 1985. Tree dynamics in an old-growth, deciduous forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 11: 31-57.
31. Perron, M., and Bousquet, J. 1997. Natural hybridization between black spruce and red spruce. Mol. Ecol. 6: 725-734.
32. Petit, R.J., Pineau, E., Demesure, B., Bacilieri, R., Ducousso, A., and Kremer, A. 1997. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 9996-10001.
33. Prentice, B. 1927. Forest survey No. 1. Herbert Davis, Forestry Farm. Unpublished report to the Department of Forestry and Conservation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.
34. Pritchard, J.K. 2000. Documentation for structure software. University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
35. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155: 945-959.
36. Schlotterer, C. 2001. Genealogical inference of closely related species based on microsatellites. Genet. Res. Camb. 78: 209-212.
37. Schwarzmann, J.F., and Gerhold, H.D. 1991. Genetic structure and mating system of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Pennsylvania. For. Sci. 37: 1376-1389.
38. Sork, V.L., Huang, S., and Wiener, E. 1993. Macrogeographic and fine-scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L. In Genetics of oaks. Edited by A. Kremer, P.S. Savill, and K.C. Steiner. Elsevier, Paris. pp. 261-270.
39. n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol. Biol. 33: 1093-1096.
40. Tomlinson, P.T., Jensen, R.J., and Hancock, J.F. 2000. Do whole tree silvic characters indicate hybridization in red oak (Quercus section Lobatae)? Am. Midl. Nat. 143: 154-168.
41. Weir, B.S. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
42. Weir, B.S., and Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370.
43. Whittemore, A.T., and Schaal, B.A. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 2540-2544.
44. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15: 323-354.