An Examination of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Bias on Curriculum-Based Measurement of Reading

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 327-342

  Kranzler, John H ^a   David Miller, M ^a   Jordan, LuAnn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842761481     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0089012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Airasian, P. W. (1989). Review of the California Achievement Tests, Forms E & F. In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 126-128). Lincoln, NE: Baros Institute of Mental Measurements.
2. Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 247-254.
3. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
4. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.), New York: Harper & Row.
6. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
7. Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford.
8. Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Blum, I. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29, 4-9.
9. Frye, E. (1968). Graph for estimating reliability. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
10. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Bentz, J. (1992). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537.
11. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
12. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.
13. Jensen, A. R. (1981). Straight talk about mental tests. New York: The Free Press.
14. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (briefform). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15. Knoff, H. M., & Dean, K. R. (1994). Curriculum-based measurement of at-risk students' reading skills: A preliminary investigation of bias. Psychological Reports, 75, 1355-1360.
16. Kranzler, J. H., Brownell, M. T., & Miller, M. D. (1998). The construct validity of curriculum-based measurement of reading: An empirical test of a rival hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 399-415.
17. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
18. Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Lynn, R. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in intelligence in the United States on the Differential Ability Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 271-273.
20. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Mehrens, W. A., & Clarizio, H. F. (1993). Curriculum-based measurement: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 241-254.
22. Miller, M. D., & Jordan, L. (1996, April). The generalizability of curriculum-based measures in reading. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
23. Potter, M. L., & Wamre, H. (1990). Curriculum-based measurement and developmental reading models: Opportunities for cross-validation. Exceptional Children, 57, 16-25.
24. Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Test bias and the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 545-573). New York: Plenum.
25. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
26. Shinn, M. R., & Habedank, L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement in special education problem identification and certification decisions. Preventing School Failure. 36, 11-15.
27. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., & Tilly, W. D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
28. Shinn, M. R., Nolet, V., & Knutson, N. (1990). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 287-308). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
29. Waldrop, J. L. (1989). Review of the California Achievement Tests, Forms E & F. In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 128-133). Lincoln, NE: Baros Institute of Mental Measurements.