Intellectual property rights and the commodity form: New dimensions in the legislated transfer of surplus value

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 304-311

  Perelman, Michael ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intellectual property rights; Value theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842760821     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613403255570     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Abrahams, P. 2002. Microsoft makes 85% margin on windows system: Disclosure made in SEC filing is likely to infuriate rivals in software sector. Financial Times, 18 November.
2. Akerlof, G. 2000. Comment on Baumol. In Economic events, ideas, and policies: The 1960's and after, ed. G. L. Perry and J. Tobin, 31-5. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Burns, R. 1999. Post-cold war worries: Cohen to call for strong military in high-tech visit. Associated Press, 18 February. Available from http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/cohen990218.html.
4. Friedman, T. L. 1999. The Lexus and the olive tree. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
5. Marx, K. 1963-71. Theories of surplus value. 3 parts. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
6. Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage.
7. Marx, K. 1977. Capital, vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
8. Mumford, L. 1963. Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
9. Perelman, M. 2001. The pathology of the U.S. economy revisited: The intractable contradictions of economic policy. New York: Palgrave.
10. Perelman, M. 2002. Steal this idea: Intellectual property rights and the corporate confiscation of creativity. New York: Palgrave.