The politics of European Union immigration policy: Institutions, salience, and harmonization

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 145-165

  Givens, Terri ^a   Luedtke, Adam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; HUMAN RIGHTS; IMMIGRATION POLICY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 1842759733     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00057.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bell, M. (2001). Meeting the challenge?: A comparison between the EU racial equality directive and the starting line. In I. Chopin & J. Niessen (Eds.), The starting line and the incorporation of the Racial Equality Directive into the national laws of the EU member states and accession states (pp. 22-54). London: Commission for Racial Equality.
3. Cichowski, R. (2001). Judicial rulemaking and the institutionalization of European Union sex equality policy. In A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz, & N. Fligstein (Eds.), The Institutionalization of Europe (pp. 113-136). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
4. Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: On a community immigration policy. Brussels: Author.
5. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: On an open method of coordination for the community immigration policy. Brussels: Author.
6. Cornelius, W., Martin, P., and Hollifield, J. (Eds.). (1994). Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Craig, P., & de Burca, G. (1998). EU Law: Text, cases and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
8. Den Boer, M. (1995). Moving between bogus and bona fide: The policing of inclusion and exclusion in Europe. In R. Miles & D. Thränhardt (Eds.), Migration and European integration: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 92-111). London: Pinter.
9. European Parliament. (2001, May). Movement and residence of EU citizens. Official Journal of the European Communities C 135(44), 189-193.
10. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (1996). A partnership among nations. London: Author.
11. Freeman, G. (1994). Britain: The deviant case. In W. Cornelius, P. Martin, & J. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (pp. 297-300). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Freeman, G. (2002). Winners and losers: Politics and the costs and benefits of migration. In A. Messina (Ed.), West European immigration and immigrant policy in the new century (pp. 77-96). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13. Garrett, G., Kelemen, R. D., & Schulz, H. (1998). The European Court of Justice, national governments, and legal integration in the European Union. International Organization, 52(1), 149-176.
14. Geddes, A. (2003). The politics of migration and immigration in Europe. London: Sage.
15. Guild, E. (1998). Competence, discretion, and third country nationals: The European Union's legal struggle with migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(4), 613-625.
16. Guiraudon, V. (2003). The constitution of a European immigration policy domain: Apolitical sociology approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263-282.
17. Haas, E. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces, 1950-57. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Hix, S., & Niessen, J. (1996). Reconsidering European migration policies: The 1996 intergovernmental conference and the reform of the Maastricht Treaty. Brussels: Migration Policy Group.
19. House of Lords. (1999). Select Committee on European Communities, thirty-first report: Incorporating the Schengen Acquis into the European Union. London: Parliamentary Stationery Office.
20. Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the nation-state. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
21. Lahav, G., & Guiraudon, V. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 163-195.
22. th Annual Meeting American Political Science Association, Boston, MA., September, 1999.
23. Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Niessen, J. (2001). The further development of European anti-discrimination policies." In I. Chopin & J. Niessen (Eds. , The starting line and the incorporation of the Racial Equality Directive into the national laws of the EU member states and accession states (pp. 7-21). London: Commission for Racial Equality.
25. Papademetriou, D. (1996). Coming together or pulling apart?: The European Union's struggle with immigration and asylum. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
26. Philip, A. (1994). European Union immigration policy: Phantom, fantasy or fact? West European Politics, 17(2), 168-191.
27. Pinder, J. (1995). European Community: The building of a union. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
28. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-460.
29. Rogers, R. (1992, Winter). The future of refugee flows and policies. International Migration Review, 26, 1112-1143.
30. th Annual Meeting American Political Science Association, Boston, MA., August-September, 2002. http://apsaproceedings.cup.org/Site/abstracts/050/050009RosenblumM.htm.
31. Rotte, R, & Zimmermann, K. (1998). Fiscal restraint and the political economy of EMU. Public Choice, 94(3/4), 385-406.
32. Santel, B. (1995). Loss of control: The build-up of a European migration and asylum regime. In R. Miles & D. Thränhardt (Eds.), Migration and European integration: The Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, pp. 75-91. London: Pinter.
33. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control?: Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges: Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
36. Stone Sweet, A., & Sandholtz, W. (1998). Integration, supranational governance, and the institutionalization of the European polity. In W. Sandholtz & A. Stone Sweet (Eds.), European integration and supranational governance (pp. 1-26). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
37. Ugur, M. (1995). Freedom of movement vs. exclusion: A reinterpretation of the "insider"-"outsider" divide in the European Union. International Migration Review, 29(4), 969-999.
38. Vaubel, R. (1994). The public choice analysis of European integration: A survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 10(1), 227-249.
39. Vink, M. (2001). The limited Europeanization of domestic citizenship policy: Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(5), 875-896.
40. Wallace, H. (1995). Britain out on a limb? Political Quarterly, 66(1), 47-58.
41. Wilson, J. Q. (Ed.). (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Harper.