Community television and the vision of media literacy, social action, and empowerment

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 624-644

  Higgins, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842743753     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838159909364513     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alliance for Community Media. (1997). General information on public, educational and governmental (PEG) access on cable television [Online]. Available: http://www.alliancecm.org/ acminfo.htm
2. Aufderheide, P. (1992). Cable television and the public interest. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 52-65.
3. Aufderheide, P. (1994, Summer). Underground cable: A survey of public access program-ming. Afterimage, 5-7.
4. Barnouw, E. (1978). The sponsor: Notes on a modern potentate. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bibby, A., Denford, C., & Cross, J. (1979). Local television: piped dreams? A critique of community TV in Britain. London: Redwing Press.
6. Blau, A. (1992). From the chair: Mission statement as touchstone. Community Television Review, 15(3), 3.
7. Boyle, D. (1997). Subject to change: Guerrilla television revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Buckingham, D. (1991, April). Media education: The limits of a discourse. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
9. Council for the Development of Community Media. (1983). Community media and the ideology of participation. In A. Mattelart & S. Siegelaub (Eds.), Communication and class struggle, vol 2 (pp. 393-401). New York: International General.
10. Dervin, B. (1983, May). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX.
11. Dervin, B. (1989). Audience as listener and learner, teacher and confidante: The sense-making approach. In R. Rice & C. Atkins (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 67-86). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier & R. R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
13. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
14. Dervin, B., & Clark, K. (1993). Communication and democracy: A mandate for procedural invention. In S. Splichal & J. Wasko (Eds.) Communication and democracy (pp. 103-140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Devine, R. H. (1990, July). Marginal notes: Consumer video, the first amendment and the future of access. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers, Washington, D.C.
16. Devine, R.H. (1992, July). Video, access and agency. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers. St. Paul, Minnesota.
17. Dowmunt, T. (Ed.). (1993). Channels of resistance: Global television and local empowerment. London: British Film Institute.
18. Downing, J. (1984). Radical media: The political experience of alternative communication. Boston: South End.
19. Downing, J. (1990). Alternative media and the Boston tea party. In J. Downing, A. Mohammadi, & A. Sreberny-Mohammadi (Eds.), Questioning the media (pp. 180-191). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Drew, J. (1995). Media activism and radical democracy. In J. Brook & I.A. Boal (Eds.). Resisting the virtual life: the culture and politics of in formation (pp. 71-83). San Francisco: City Lights.
21. Engelman, R. (1990). The origins of public access cable television: 1966-1972. Journalism Monographs 123, 1-47.
22. Enzensberger, H. M. (1970). Constituents of a theory of the media (S. Hood, Trans.). In H. M. Enzensberger, Dreamers of the absolute: Essays on politics, crime and culture (pp. 20-53). London: Century Hutchinson.
23. Freire, P. (1970/1989). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
24. Freire, P. (1996). Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. (D. Macedo with Q. Macedo and A. Oliveira, Trans.). New York: Routledge.
25. Fuller, L. K. (1994). Community television in the united states: A sourcebook on public, educational, and governmental access. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
26. Garnham, N. (1990). The myth of video: A disciplinary reminder. In F. Inglis (Ed.), Capitalism and communication: Global culture and the economics of information (pp. 64-69). London: Sage.
27. Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in the Appalachian village. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28. Gillespie, G. (1975). Public access cable television in the united states and canada. New York: Praeger.
29. Girard, B. (Ed.). (1992). A passion for radio: Radio waves and community. Montreal: Black Rose.
30. Giroux, H.A. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31. Good, L. (1989).Power, hegemony, and communication theory. In I. Angus & S. Jhally (Eds.), Cultural politics in contemporary america (pp. 51-64). New York: Routledge.
32. Halloran, J. D., & Jones, M. (1984). Learning about the media: Media education and communication research. Paris: UNESCO.
33. Higgins, J. W. (1994). Tracing the vision: A study of community volunteer producers, public access cable television, and empowerment. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1994. (University Microfilms No. 9517017).
34. Ingraham, S. B. (1991). An NFLCP editorial response. Community Television Review, 14(4), 2.
35. Johnson, F. (1994). The real work is media education. Community Media Review, 17(1), 4+.
36. Johnson, N. & Gerlach, G. G. (1977). The coming fight for cable access. Yale review of law and social action, 2(3), 217-225.
37. Lewis, P. (Ed.). (1993). Alternative media: Linking global and local. Paris: UNESCO.
38. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: MacMillan.
40. Marcuse. H. (1965/1983). Repressive tolerance. In H. A. Bosmajian (Ed.), Principles and practices of freedom of speech (2nd ed., pp. 316-337). Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
41. Masterman, L. (1980). Teaching about television. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
42. Mattelart, A., & J.M. Piemme. (1980). New means of communication: New questions for the left. Media, Culture, and Society, 2, 321-338.
43. McLaren, P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44. Paper Tiger Television Collective. (1991). Roar! The Paper Tiger television guide to media activism. New York: PTTC.
45. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Rodriguez, C. (1996). Shedding Useless Notions of Alternative Media. Peace Review, 8(1), 63-68.
47. Savolainen, R. (1993). The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 13-28.
48. Shamberg, M., & Raindance Corporation. (1971). Guerrilla television. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
49. Sholle, D., & Denski, S. (1994). Media education: The (re)production of culture. Westport, CT: Bergin.
50. Slack, J. D. (1984). Communication technologies and society: Conceptions of causality and the politics of technological intervention. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Sloan Commission on Cable Communications. (1971). On the cable: The television of abundance. New York: McCraw-Hill.
52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Streeter, T. (1987). The cable fable revisited: Discourse, policy, and the making of cable television. Critical studies in mass communication, 4(2), 174-200.
54. Streeter, T. (1990). Beyond freedom of speech and the public interest: The relevance of critical legal studies to communications policy. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 43-63.
55. Thede, N., & Ambrosi, A. (Eds.). (1991). Video the changing world. New York: Black Rose.
56. Willener, A., Milliard, G., & Ganty, A. (1972). Videology and utopia: Explorations in a new medium. London: Routledge.
57. Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. New York: Shocken Books.