GT-COMET: An architecture to enhance error tolerance in safety-critical systems

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 258-261

  Palmer, Michael T ^a,b   Chappell, Alan R ^a   Thurman, David A ^a,c   Mitchell, Christine M ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ERROR TOLERANCE; SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 1842738611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120004400170     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Boeing. (1998). Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: Worldwide Operations, 1959-1997. Seattle, WA: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.
2. Callantine, T. J., & Mitchell, C. M. (1994). A methodology for understanding how operators select and use automation to control complex dynamic systems. Paper presented at the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
3. Chou, C.D., Madhavan, D., & Funk, K. (1994). Studies of cockpit task management errors. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(4), 307-320.
4. Funk, K. (1991). Cockpit task management: Preliminary definitions, normative theory, error taxonomy, and design recommendations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(4), 271-285.
5. Khatwa, R. & Helmreich, R.L. (1999). Analysis of critical factors during approach and landing in accidents and normal flight. Flight Safety Digest, 77(11-12) & 18(1-2), 1-77.
6. Khatwa, R. & Helmreich, R.L. (1999). Analysis of critical factors during approach and landing in accidents and normal flight. Flight Safety Digest, 77(11-12) & 18(1-2), 1-77.
7. Nii, H.P. (1986a). Blackboard systems (Part 1): The blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures. AI Magazine, 7(2), 38-53.
8. Norman, D.A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
9. Palmer, E.A., & Degani, A. (1991). Electronic checklists: Evaluation of two levels of automation. Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
10. Thurman, D.A., Chappell, A.R., & Mitchell, C.M. (1998). An enhanced architecture for OFMspert: A domain-independent system for intent inferencing. Paper presented at the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA.
11. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.