The contribution of magnetic resonance examination in the diagnosis of endometriosis;Přínos vyšetření magnetickou rezonancí v diagnostice endomtriózy

Ceska Radiologie

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-85

  Kreuzberg, Boris ^a,c   Kastner, J ^a   Novotny Z ^b   Ulcova Gallova Z ^b   Opatrny V ^c   Mukensnabl P ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c Gynekol Porodnicke Oddeleni NsP ^*  (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Derivatives of hemoglobin in MR image; Differential diagnostic problems; Endometriosis; MRI of pelvis

Indexed keywords

DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; HEMOSIDERIN; METHEMOGLOBIN;

ADENOMYOSIS; ADHESION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY INFLAMMATION; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RECTUM; SALPINGITIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; TERATOMA;

EID: 1842737486     PISSN: 12107883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arrive, L., Hricak, H., Martin, M. C. Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging. Radiology, 1989, 171, s. 687-692.
2. Bis, K. G., Vrachliotis, T. G., Agrawal, R., Shetty, A. N., Maximovich, A., Hricak, H. Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging spectrum with laparoscopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. RadioGraphics, 1997, 17, s. 639-655.
3. Glastonbury, C. M. The shading sign. Radiology, 2002, 224, s. 199-201.
4. Higgins, C. B., Hricak, H., Helms, C. A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1992, s. 868-872.
5. Chapron, C., Liaros, E., Fayet, P., Hoeffel, C., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and endometriosis: Deeply infiltrating endometriosis does not originate from the rectovaginal septum. Gynecologic Obstetrics Invest., 2002, 53, s. 204-208.
6. Kunz, G., Leyendecker, G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: Characterisation, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 2002, 4, Suppl. 3, s. 5-9.
7. Patel, M. D., Feldstein, V. A., Chen, D. C., Lipson, S. D., Filly, R. A. Endometriomas: Diagnostic performance of US. Radiology, 1999, 210, s. 739-745.
8. Redwine, D. B. Age related evolution in colour appearance of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48, s. 1062-1063.
9. Scoutt, L. M., McCarty, S. M. Female pelvis. In Stark, D. D., Bradley, W. G. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 3rd ed. Mosby, 1999, s. 580-582.
10. Siegelman, E. S., Outwater, E. K. Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology, 1999, 212, s. 5-18.
11. Stratton, P., Winkel, C., Premkumar, A., Chow, C., Wilson, J., Hearns-Stokes, R., Heo, S., Merino, M., Nieman, L. K. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic examination for the detection of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril., 2003, roč. 79, č. 5, s. 1078-85.
12. Sugimura, K., Okizuka, H., Imaoka, I., et al. Pelvic endometriosis: Detection and diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology, 1993, 188, s. 435-438.
13. Sugimura, K., Okizuka, H., Kaji, Y., et al. MRI in predicting the response of ovarian endometriomas to hormone therapy. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1996, 20, s. 145-150.
14. Togashi, K., Nishimura, K., Kimura, I., et al. Endometrial cysts: Diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology, 1991, 180, s. 73-78.
15. Umaria, N., Olliff, J. F. Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis. Brit. J. Radiol., 2001, 74, s. 556-62.
16. Woodward, P. J., Sohaey, R., Mezzetti, T. P. Jr. Endometriosis: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics, 2001, 21, s. 193-216.
17. Zawin, M., McCarthy, S., Scoutt, L., Comité, F. Monitoring therapy with a gonadotropin releasing hormone analog: Utility of MR imaging. Radiology, 1990, 175, s. 503-506.