Developmental versus environmental control of early leaf phenology in juvenile Ohio buckeye (Aesculus glabra)

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-36

  Augspurger, Carol K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bud break; Developmental constraint; Leaf drop; Leaf expansion; Leaf senescence; Thermal sums

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FORESTRY; SEED; THERMAL EFFECTS;

CANOPY; SPRING PHENOLOGY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

DECIDUOUS FOREST; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; LEAF; PHENOLOGY;

ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AESCULUS; AESCULUS GLABRA; AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM; JUNONIA COENIA;

EID: 1842735080     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b03-121     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Augspurger, C.K., and Bartlett, E.A. 2003. Leaf phenology of juvenile vs. adult trees in a temperate deciduous forest. Tree Physiol. 23: 517-525.
2. Chuine, I., and Cour, P. 1999. Climatic determinants of budburst seasonality in four temperate-zone tree species. New Phytol. 143: 339-349.
3. Day, M.E., Greenwood, M.S., and Diaz-Sala, C. 2002. Age- and size-related trends in woody plant shoot development: regulatory pathways and evidence for genetic control. Tree Physiol. 22: 507-513.
4. de Pamphilis, C.W., and Neufeld, H.S. 1989. Phenology and ecophysiology of Aesculus sylvatica, a vernal understory tree. Can. J. Bot. 67: 2161-2167.
5. Dutilleut, P., and Potvin, C. 1995. Among-environment heteroscedasticity and genetic autocorrelation: implications for the study of phenotypic plasticity. Genetics, 139: 1815-1829.
6. Eliás, P., Kratochvilova, I., Janous, D., Marek, M., and Masarovicová, E. 1989. Stand microclimate and physiological activity of tree leaves in an oak-hornbeam forest. I. Stand microclimate. Trees, 4: 227-233.
7. Fry, J.D. 1992. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: meaning of the parameters. Evolution, 46: 540-550.
8. Gill, D.S., Amthor, J.S., and Bormann, F.H. 1998. Leaf phenology, photosynthesis, and the persistence of saplings and shrubs in a mature northern hardwood forest. Tree Physiol. 18: 281-289.
9. Hänninen, H. 1990. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees in cool and temperate regions. Acta For. Fenn. 213: 1-47.
10. Hänninen, H., Häkkinen, R., Hari, P., and Koski, V. 1990. Timing of growth in relation to climatic adaptation of northern woody plants. Tree Physiol. 6: 29-39.
11. Hunter, A.F., and Lechowicz, M.J. 1992. Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 597-604.
12. Jackson, M.T. 1966. Effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology, 47: 407-415.
13. Kramer, K. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity of the phenology of seven European tree species in relation to climatic warming. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 93-104.
14. Larcher, W. 1995. Physiological plant ecology. 3rd ed. Springer, New York.
15. Lee, R. 1978. Forest micrometeorology. Columbia University Press, New York.
16. McGee, C.E. 1986. Budbreak for twenty-three upland hardwoods compared under forest canopies and in recent clearcuts. For. Sci. 32: 924-935.
17. Mowbray, T.B., and Ousting, H.J. 1968. Vegetation gradients in relation to environment and phenology in a southern Blue Ridge gorge, USA. Ecol. Monogr. 38: 309-344.
18. Schmid, B., and Dolt, C. 1994. Effects of maternal and paternal environment and genotype on offspring phenotype in Solidago altissima L. Evolution, 48: 1525-1549.
19. Seiwa, K. 1999a. Changes in leaf phenology are dependent on tree height in Acer mono, a deciduous broad-leaved tree. Ann. Bot. (London) 83: 355-361.
20. Seiwa, K. 1999b. Ontogenetic changes in leaf phenology of Ulmus davidiana var. japonica, a deciduous broad-leaved tree. Tree Physiol. 19: 793-797.
21. Thomas, S.C., and Winner, W.E. 2002. Photosynthetic differences between saplings and adult trees: an integration of field results by meta-analysis. Tree Physiol. 22: 117-127.
22. Uemura, S. 1994. Pattern of phenology in forest understory. Can. J. Bot. 72: 409-414.
23. Weiner, J., Martinez, S., Mueller-Schaerer, H., Stoll, P., and Schmid, B. 1997. How important are environmental maternal effects in plants? A study with Centaurea maculosa. J. Ecol. 85: 133-142.
24. Wolfe, L.M. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum: role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution, 47: 374-386.