Use of Educational and Psychological Tests Internationally

Applied Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 157-172

  Oakland, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842733357     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00166.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Asssociation.
2. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychology and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
3. Bartram, D. (1995). The development of standards for the use of psychological tests in occupational settings: The competence approach. The Psychologist, 24, 219-223.
4. Bartram, D. (1996). Test qualifications and test use in the UK: The competence approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 62-71.
5. Bartram, D. (2001). The development of international guidelines on test use: The International Test Commission project. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 33-54
6. Bartram, D., & Coyne, I. (1998). Variations in national patterns for testing and test use: The ITC/EFPPA international survey. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 4, 249-260.
7. British Psychological Society (1998a). Code of conduct, ethical principles and guidelines. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
8. British Psychological Society (1998b). Certificate and register of competence in occupational testing general information pack (level A). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
9. British Psychological Society (1999a). Certificate and register of competence in occupational testing general information pack (level B). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
10. British Psychological Society Steering Committee on Test Standards (1999b). Checklist of competencies in educational testing: Foundation level. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
11. Canadian Psychological Association (1987). Guidelines for educational and psychological testing. Ottawa: Canadian Psychological Association.
12. Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
13. DiMilia, L., Smith, P.A., & Brown, D.F. (1994). Management selection in Australia: A comparison with British and French findings. International journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 80-90.
14. Eyde, L.D., Moreland, K.L., Robertson, G.J., Primoff, E.S., & Most, R.B. (1988). Test user qualifications: A data-based approach to promoting good test use. Issues in Scientific Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Fitzgerald, C., & Ward, P. (1998). Computer-based testing: A global perspective. Paper presented at the International Congress of Applied Psychology, San Francisco, CA, August.
16. Gowing, M.K., & Slivinski, L.W. (1994). A review of North American selection procedures: Canada and the USA. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 102-114.
17. Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
18. Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.) (in press). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
19. Hambleton, R.K., & Zaal, J.N. (Eds.) (1991). Advances in educational and psychological testing. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Hu, S., & Oakland, T. (1991). Global and regional perspectives on testing children and youth: An international survey. International Journal of Psychology, 26(3), 329-344.
21. Ilon, L. (1992). A framework for costing tests in third world settings. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
22. International Test Commission (2000). International guidelines for test use. Louvainla-Neuve, Belgium: author.
23. Joint Committee on Testing Practices (1993). Responsible test use. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Kelleghan, T., & Greaney, V. (1992). Using examinations to improve education: A study of fourteen African nations. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
25. Kendall, I., Jenkinson, J., De Lemos, M., & Clancy, D. (1997). Supplement to guidelines for the use of psychological tests. Sydney: Australian Psychological Society.
26. Koene, C.J. (1997). Tests and professional ethics and values in European psychologists. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 219-228.
27. Lapointe, A., Askew, J., & Mead, N. (1992). Learning science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service's Center for the Assessment of Educational Progress.
28. Lapointe, A., Mead, N., & Askew, J. (1992). Learning mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service's Center for the Assessment of Educational Progress.
29. Lindsay, G. (1996). Psychology as an ethical discipline and profession. European Psychologist, 1, 79-88.
30. Lockheed, M. (1992). World Bank support for capacity building: The challenge of educational assessment. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
31. Medrich, E., & Griffith, J. (1992). International mathematics and science assessment: What we have learned. Washington, DC: US Department of Education (NCES 92-011).
32. Muniz, J., Prieto, G., Almeida, L., & Bartram, D. (1999). Test use in Spain, Portugal and Latin American countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 151-157.
33. Myers, I.B., McCauley, M.H., Quenk, N.L., & Hammer, A.L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
34. Oakland, T. (1995). Test use with children and youth internationally: Current status and future directions. In T. Oakland & R. Hambleton (Eds.), International perspectives on academic assessment. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Oakland, T. (in press). Selected ethical issues relevant to test adaptations. In R.K. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
36. Oakland, T., & Hambleton, R. (1995). International perspectives on academic assessment. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Oakland, T., & Hu, S. (1991). Professionals who administer tests with children and youth: An international survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9(2), 108-120.
38. Oakland, T., & Hu, S. (1992). The top ten tests used with children and youth worldwide. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 19, 99-120.
39. Oakland, T., & Hu, S. (1993). International perspectives on tests used with children and youth. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 501-517.
40. Oakland, T., Poortinga, Y.H., Schlegel, J., & Hambleton, R.K. (2001). International Test Commission: Its history, current status, and future directions. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 3-32.
41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2003). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2003. Paris: OECD.
42. Schiller, K. (Ed.) (2000). Implications of TIMMS analysis for education. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice, 1(2), 3-24.
43. Schuler, H., Frier, D., & Kauffmann, M. (1993). Personalauswahl, im europaischen Vergleich. Gottingen: Verlag fur Angewandte Psychologie.
44. Shackleton, V., & Newell, S. (1994). European management selection methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91-102.
45. Thiemann, A. (1998). Digital publishing and test publishers' changing copyright opportunities. Paper presented at the International Congress of Applied Psychology, San Francisco, CA, August.
46. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
47. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
48. Wang, Z.M. (1993). Psychology in China: A review. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 87-116.