Electric Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the Treatment of Angina Pectoris: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Neuromodulation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 89-96

  Rasmussen, Malene Bladt ^a   Hole, Peter ^a   Andersen, Claus ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cost utility analysis; Quality of life; Spinal cord stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART PACING; HUMAN; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION;

EID: 1842732198     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1094-7159.2004.04012.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Andersson B et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action. Br Med J 1993;307:477-480.
2. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson LE et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris. Circulation 1998;97:1157-1163.
3. DeJongste MJ, Haaksma J, Haustvay R et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Br Heart J 1994;71:413-418.
4. DeJongste MJ Spinal cord stimulation for ischemic heart disease. Neurol Res 2000;22:293-298.
5. Rasmussen MB, Andersen C, Andersen P, Frandsen F. Cost-utility analyse af elektrisk rygmarvs-stimulation til behandling af angina pectoris. Ugeskr Laeger 1992;154:1180-1184. Article in Danish with summary in English.
6. Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Bell CM. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976-97. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:964-972.
7. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GJ, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications 1997.
8. Gandjour A, Lauterbach KW. Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris. Pharmacoeconomics 1999;16:141-152.
9. Stone PW, Teutsch S, Chapman RH, Bell C, Goldie SJ, Neumann PJ. Cost-utility analyses of clinical preventive services: Published ratios, 1976-97. Am J Prev Med 2000;19:15-23.
10. Rushton DN Electrical stimulation in the treatment of pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:407-415.
11. Andersen C, Hole P. Long-term home treatment with epidural analgesia does not affect later spinal cord stimulation in patients with otherwise intractable angina pectoris. Clin J Pain 1998;14:315-319.
12. Scherer C, Enggaard TP, Andersen C The use of neuromodulation techniques in intractable angina pectoris-a clinical protocol. 6th INS World Congress Madrid, Spain, 25-28 June 2003.
13. Munk S, Pedersen KM, Helmer-Hansen HB. Total hoftealloplastik-en omkostnings-effektanalyse. Ugeskr Laeger 1988;150:284-287 (Article in Danish with summary in English).
14. New York Heart Association Criteria Committee, Harold EB Pardee, Chairman. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of the heart and blood vessels. 5th edn. New York: American Heart Association 1953.
15. Andersen C, Hole P, Oxhoj H. Spinal cord stimulation as a pain treatment for angina pectoris. Pain Clin 1995;8:333-339.
16. Murray S, Carson KG, Ewings PD, Collins PD, James MA. Spinal cord stimulation significantly decreases the need for hospital admission for chest pain in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Heart 1999;82:89-92.
17. Pedersen KM, Alban A, Danneskiold-Samsoe B. Vaerdien af liv og lemmer. Ugeskr Laeger 1990;152:212-217.
18. Bentzen N, Christiansen T, Pedersen KM. Measurements of health status in a general population survey. Choice of instruments and issues in scaling. University of Odense. Department of Public Finance and Policy, 1986, no. 19.
19. Hillman AL, Kim MS. A standard approach to discounting health outcomes. Pharmaeconomics 1995;7:198-205.
20. Brodison A, Chauhan A. Spinal-cord stimulation in management of angina. Lancet 1999;354:1748-1749.
21. Andersen C, Hole P, Oxhoj H. Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994;71:419-421.
22. Andersen C, Scherer C, Enggaard TP Ten years spinal cord stimulation (SCS) follow-up for intractable angina pectoris. 6th INS World Congress Madrid, Spain, 25-28 June 2003.
23. Di Pede F, Lanza GA, Zuin G et al. Immediate and long-term clinical outcome after spinal cord stimulation for refractory stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiolol 2003;91:951-955.
24. Andrell P, Ekre O, Eliasson T et al. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation versus coronary bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris-long-term results from the ESBY study. Cardiology 2003;99:20-24.
25. Eliasson T, Jern S, Augustinsson L-E, Mannheimer C. Safety aspects of spinal cord stimulation in severe angina pectoris. Coron Artery Dis 1994;5:845-850.
26. Sanderson J, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D et al. Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina: Long-term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994;15:810-814.
27. Cox D, Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A et al. Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple? J R Statis Soc A 1992;155:353-393.
28. Mehrez A, Gafni A. Preference based outcome measures for economic evaluation of drug interventions: Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus healthy years equivalents (HYEs). Pharmacoeconomics 1992;1:338-345.
29. Whitney CW, Von Korff M. Regression to the mean in treated versus untreated chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:281-285.
30. Olsen JB. On what basis should health be discounted? J Health Econ 1993;12:39-53.