Active/passive combination-type performance measurement method using change-of-measure framework

Computer Communications

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 868-879

  Ishibashi, Keisuke ^a   Kanazawa, Toshiyuki ^b   Aida, Masaki ^a   Ishii, Hirosi ^c  

^a NTT CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b 11 40 Hijiyamahonmachi   (Japan)

^c TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Active measurement; Change of measure; Passive measurement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); ESTIMATION; INTERNET; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; PROBABILITY; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

ACTIVE MEASUREMENT; CHANGE-OF-MEASURE; PASSIVE MEASUREMENT;

PACKET NETWORKS;

EID: 1842731925     PISSN: 01403664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. V. Paxson, J. Mahdavi, A. Adams, M. Mathis, An architecture for large-scale Internet measurement, IEEE Commun. 36 (8).
2. CAIDA Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis. URL http://www.caida.org/tools/.
3. NLANR Measurement and Operation Analysis Team. URL http://moat.nlanr.net/ .
4. IPMA: Internet Performance Measurement and Analysis. URL http://www.merit.edu/ipma .
5. Internet End-to-end Performance Monitoring. URL http://www-iepm.slac. stanford.edu/.
6. V. Paxson, End-end Internet packet dynamics, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 7 (3).
7. Savage S., Collins A., Hoffman E., Snell J., Anderson T. The end-to-end effects of Internet path selection. ACM SIGCOMM'99:1999.
8. Bolot J.C. End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet. Proc. SIGCOMM'93. 1993.
9. Paxson V., Almes G., Mahdavi J., Mathis M. Framework for IP performance metrics. RFC2330. 1998.
10. Almes G., Kalidindi S., Zekauskas M., one-way A. A one-way delay metric for IPPM. RFC2679. 1999.
11. Almes G., Kalidindi S., Zekauskas M., one-way A. A one-way packet loss metric for IPPM. RFC2680. 1999.
12. Keshave S. A control-theoretic approach to flow control. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '91. 1991.
13. Caceres R., Duffield N.G., Horowitz J., Towsley D.F., Bu T. Multicast-based inference of network-internal characteristics: accuracy of packet loss estimation. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM. 1999.
14. Wolff R.W. Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues. 1988;Prentice Hall.
15. V. Paxon, S. Floyd, Wide-area traffic: The failure of Poisson modeling, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.
16. W. Leland, M. Taqqu, W. Willinger, D. Wilson, On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (extended version) 2.
17. Ishibashi K., Aida M., Kuribayashi S. Estimating packet loss-rate by using delay information and combinated with change-of-measure framework. Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM. 2003.
18. B-ISDN operation and maintenance principle and functions, ITU Recommendation I.610, ITU-T. 1995.
19. Lindh T. A framework for embedded monitoring of QoS parameters in IP-based virtual private networks. Proc. PAM2001. 2001.
20. Lindh T. A new approach to performance monitoring in IP networks - combining active and passive methods. Proc. PAM2002. 2002.
21. Beige M., Jennings R., Verma D. Low overhead continuous monitoring of IP network performance. Proc. SPECTS'99. 1999.
22. I. Cozzani, S. Giordano, Traffic sampling methods for end-to-end QoS evaluation in large heterogeneous networks, Computer Netw. ISDN Syst. 30.
23. Fraleigh C., Diot C., Lyles B., Moon S., Owezarski P., Papagiannaki D., Tobagi F. Design and deployment of a passive monitoring infrastructure. Proc. PAM2001. 2001.
24. M. Allman, A web server's view of the transport layer, ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. 30 (5).
25. Martin H.S., McGregor A.J., Cleary J.G. Analysis of Internet delay times. Proc. PAM2000. 2000.
26. Stemm M., Seshan S., Katz R.H. A network measurement architecture for adaptive applications. INFOCOM 1. 2000.
27. Active-Passive.URL http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/.
28. P. J. Smith, M. Shafi, H. Gao, Quick simulation: a review of importance sampling techniques in communications systems, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 15(4).
29. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator-ns (version 2). URL http://www.isi.edu/ nsnam/ns .