What is and can be attributed to the therapeutic relationship?

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 25-33

  Beutler, Larry E ^a   Harwood, T Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Generic model; Prescriptive therapy; Psychotherapy outcome; Therapeutic alliance; Treatment selection

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTION; PRESCRIPTION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING; VARIANCE;

EID: 1842728479     PISSN: 00220116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015579111666     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Ahn, H. & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where o where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48, 251-257.
2. Andrews, H. B. (2000). The myth of the scientist-practitioner: A reply to R. King (1998) and N. King and Ollendick (1998). Australian Psychologist, 35, 60-63.
3. Beutler, L. E., & Clarkin, J. (1990). Systematic treatment selection: Toward targeted therapeutic interventions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
4. Beutler, L. E., Clarkin, J. F., & Bongar, B. (2000). Guidelines for the systematic treatment of the depressed patient. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beutler, L. E., Moleiro, C., Malik, M., & Harwood, T. M. (2000, June). The UC Santa Barbara Study of fitting therapy to patients: First results. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (international), Chicago, Ill.
6. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.
7. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 85-716.
8. DeRubeis, R. J. & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Empirically supported individual and group psychological treatments for adult mental disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 37-52.
9. Harwood, T. M., Beutler, L. E., Castillo, S., & Karno, M. (in press). Common and Specific Effects of Couples Treatment for Alcoholism: A test of the Generic Model of Psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
10. Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139-149.
11. Jones, E. E., Cummings, J. D., & Horowitz, M. J. (1988). Another look at the nonspecific hypothesis of therapeutic effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 48-55.
12. Karno, M., Beutler, L. E., & Harwood, T. M. (in press). Interactions between psychotherapy process and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: A preliminary report. Addictive Behaviors.
13. Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross and M. R. Goldfried (Eds), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration (pp. 94-129). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
14. Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., Seligman, D. A., & Krause, E. D. (in press). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
15. Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.
16. Nathan, P. E., & Gorman, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). A guide to treatments that work. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1987). A generic model of psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic Psychology, 6, 6-27.
18. Patterson, K. (1994). The determination of distinctions and commonalities between two manualized treatments for alcoholism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
19. Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (1996). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Rounsaville, B. J., Chevron, E. S., Prusoff, B. A., Elkin, I., Imber, S., Sotsky, S., & Watkins, J. (1987). The relation between specific and general dimensions of the psychotherapy process in interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55, 379-384.
21. Shapiro, D. A., & Shapiro, D. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 581-604.
22. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Stevens, S. E., Hynan, M. T., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of common factor and specific treatment effects across the outcome domains of the phase model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 70, 273-290.
24. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.