Interactive reduct evolutional computation for aesthetic design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1 B, Issue , 2003, Pages 1063-1072

  Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi ^a   Fukuda, Shuichi ^a  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Conceptual design; Favored feature; Human attention; Kansei; Reduct; Rough set theory

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ROUGH SET THEORY; USER INTERFACES;

AESTHETICS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; FAVORED FEATURE; HUMAN ATTENTION; KANSEI; REDUCT;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 1842712467     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2003/cie-48287     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Dubois, D., Prade,H., (1992), Putting tough sets and fuzzy sets together. In: R. Slowinski(Ed.), Intelligent Decision Support - Handbook of Applications and Advances of Rough Sets Theory. Kliwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp.203-232.
2. th annual conf. On Evolutionary Programming, Sandiego, CA., pp.53-65.
3. Mori N., Takanashi, R., (2000), Knowledge acquisition from the data consisting of categories added with degrees of conformity - Proposal of extended Reduct calculation in Rough Set Theory, Kansei Engineering International Vol.1 No.4, pp.19-24.
4. Nagamichi, M.,(1995), Kansei Engineering: Anew ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol.15, No.1, pp3-11.
5. Nakanishi, Y., (1996), Applying Evolutionary System to Design Aid System, in ALIFE V, Poster Presentation, PP-25, pp.147-157.
6. Osgood,C.G. Suci and Tannenbaum, P., The measurement of meaning, (1957), University of Illinois Press
7. Pawlak, Z.,(1982), Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 11, pp.341-356.
8. Pawlak Z., (1984), Rough classification, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies vol 20, pp.469-483.
9. Pawlak Z. and Skowron A., (1994), Rough membership function, in: R.R. Yager, M. Fedrizzi, and J.Kacprzyk(eds.), Advances in the Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidence, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp.251-271
10. Pawlak, Z., Grzymaa-Busse, J. W., Sowinski, R. & Ziarko, W. (1995), Rough sets, Comm. ACM, 38, pp.89-95.
11. Smyth, S.N., Wallace D.R., (2000), Toward the synthesis of aesthetic product form, Proc. of ASME DETEC'00 Computers and information in Engineering conference.
12. th International conference on soft computing and information /Intelligent system.
13. Yamada, R.,Nagai, K., Onishi, H., Kishimoto, K., (1999), A Method of KANSEI Acquisition to 3D Shape Desing and its Application, Proc. of the 1999 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction Pisa, Italy, pp 369-374.
14. Yanagisawa, H., Fukuda, S., Development of Inductrial Design Support System Considering Customers' Subjective Evaluation (in Japanese), (2001), Transactions of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 68-675, pp.3431-3438.