Testing phylogenetic hypotheses using an Hennigian approach and DNA sequence data

Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 131-136

  Richardson, B J ^a   Stern, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

DNA sequence data; Parsimony; Phylogenetic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842689089     PISSN: 09475745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1997.tb00414.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ballard, J. W.; Olsen, G.; Faith, D. P.; Odgers, W. A.; Rowell, D. M.; Atkinson, P. W., 1992: Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258, 1345-1348.
2. Edwards, A. W., 1996: The origin and early development of the method of minimum evolution for the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 45, 79-91.
3. Felsenstein, J., 1978: Cases in which parsimony and compatibility studies will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410.
4. _; 1988: Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22, 521-565.
5. Farris, J. S., 1983: The logical basis of phylogenetic systematics. In: Platnick, N. I.; Funk, V. A. (eds), Advances in Cladistics. New York: Columbia, pp. 7-36.
6. Hennig, W., 1966: Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. 263 pp.
7. Huelsenbeck, J. P., 1995: Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17-48.
8. Jukes, T. H.; Cantor, C. R., 1969: Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro, H. N. (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York: Academic Press. pp. 21-132.
9. Lake, J. A., 1987: Rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 167-191.
10. Richardson, B. J.; Baverstock, P.B.; Adams, M., 1986: Allozyme Electrophoresis: a Handbook for Animal Systematics and Populations Studies. Sydney: Academic Press.
11. Sober, E., 1983: Parsimony in systematics: philosophical issues. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 335-357.
12. Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F.J., 1981: Biometry, second edn. New York: W. H. Freeman. 859 pp.
13. Sourdis, J.; Nei, M., 1988: Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 298-311.
14. Swofford, D. C.; Olsen, G. J., 1990: Phylogenetic reconstruction. In: Hillis, D. M.; Moritz, C. (eds), Molecular Systematics. Sunderland, M.: Sinauer. pp. 411-500.
15. Wägele, J. W., 1995: On the information content of characters in comparative morphology and molecular systematics. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 33, 42-47.
16. _; Stanjek, G., 1995: Arthropod phylogeny inferred from partial 12SrRNA revisited: monophyly of the Tracheata depends on sequence alignment. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 33, 75-80.
17. Yang, Z., 1993: Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1396-1401.
18. Zharkikh, A.; Li, W. H., 1993: Inconsistency of the maximum-parsimony method, the case of five taxa with a molecular clock. Syst. Biol. 42, 113-125.