Digital Photography, Confidentiality, and Teledermatology

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 140, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 477-478

  Goldberg, David J ^a  

^a Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of New York & New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; EDITORIAL; IMAGING; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT RIGHT; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECOMMUNICATION;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHOTOGRAPHY; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842686286     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.4.477     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Scheinfeld N. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:473-476.
2. Bradham DD. The information superhighway and telemedicine: applications, status, and issues. Wake Forest Law Rev. 1995;30:145-149.
3. Margolis RE. Law and policy barriers hamper growth of telemedicine. Health-Span. 1994;11.
4. Gotts IK, Rutenberg AD. Navigating the global information superhighway: a bumpy road lies ahead. Harvard J Law Technol. 1995;27:275-232.
5. LaserNews.net. Available at: http://www.lasernews.net. Accessed January 1, 2004.
6. Schwartz PM. The protection of privacy in health care reform. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1995;48:295-296,
7. Taub S. Doctors, AIDS, and confidentiality in the 1990s. J Marshall Law Rev. 1994;27:331-343.
8. Doughty R. The confidentiality of HIV-related information. Calif Law Rev. 1994;82:111-118.