Hybrid genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks for complex design optimization in CFD

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1257-1278

  Duvigneau, R ^a   Visonneau, M ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE MÉCANIQUE DES FLUIDES   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Genetic algorithms; Navier Stokes; Shape optimization

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; REYNOLDS NUMBER; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); TURBULENCE;

DETERMINISTIC METHODS; HYBRID GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODELING; NEURAL NETWORK;

EID: 1842684896     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.688     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Computers and Fluids 1999; 28:443-480.
2. Jameson A, Martinelli L, Pierce NA. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equation. Theorical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 10:213-237.
3. Anderson WK, Nielsen E. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes using the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal 1999; 37:1411-1419.
4. Giunta A, Dudley J, Narducci R, Grossman B, Haftka R, Mason W, Watson L. Noisy aerodynamic response and smooth approximations in HSCT design. AIAA Paper 94-4316, 1994.
5. Hosder S, Grossman B, Haftka R, Mason W, Watson L. Observations on CFD simulation uncertainties. AIAA Paper 2002-5531, 2002.
6. Madsen J. Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization. AIAA Journal 2000; 38:1512-1518.
7. Goldberg D. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley Company Inc: Reading, MA, 1989.
8. Poloni C, Giurgevich A, Onesti L, Pediroda V. Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for a complex design problem in fluid dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 186:403-420.
9. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1991.
10. Menter F. Zonal two-equations k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 93-2906, 1993.
11. Deng G, Visonneau M. Comparison of explicit algebraic stress models and second-order turbulence closures for steady flows around ships. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Piquet J (ed). Ecole Centrale de Nantes: Nantes, France, 1999.
12. Farhat C, Degand C, Koobus B, Lesoinne M. Torsional springs for two dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 163:231-245.
13. Sederberg T, Parry S. Free-from deformation of solid geometric models. Computer Graphics 1986; 20:151-160.
14. Giotis A, Giannakoglou K. Eurogen 99, Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
15. Giotis A, Giannakoglou K. Genetic Algorithms for Optimization in Aeronautics and Turbomachinery, VKI Lecture Series, VKI Publications: Brussels.
16. Powell M. Radial basis function methods for interpolation to functions of many variables. In Fifth Hellenic-European Conference on Computer Mathematics and its Applications, Athens, 2001.
17. Marazzi M, Nocedal J. Wedge trust region methods for derivative free optimization. Mathematical Programming 2002; 91:289-305.