Measuring the pressure pattern of the joint surface in the uninjured knee

Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 116, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 196-200

  Kdolsky, Richard K ^a   Al Arabid, Basil ^a   Fuchs, Martin ^b   Schabus, Rudolf ^a   Vécsei, Vilmos ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b KH St Pölten ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Cadaver study; Joint surface pressure pattern; Real time data acquisition; Uninjured knee

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT PRESSURE; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE FUNCTION; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PUMP; RECORDING; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

EID: 1842684212     PISSN: 00435325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03040487     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Clancy WG Jr, Nelson DA, Reider B, Narechania RG (1982) Anterior cruciate reconstruction using one-third of the patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tendon transfer. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 64-A: 352-359
2. Grøntvedt T, Engebretsen L, Benum P, Fasting O, Mølster A, Strand T (1996) A prospective, randomized study of three operations for acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: five-year follow-up of one hundred and thirty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78-A: 159-168
3. Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the International Knee Documentation guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6: 107-114
4. Kdolsky R, Kwasny O, Schabus R (1996) Knieformel: ein neues Beurteilungsschema in der Kniebandchirurgie. Acta Chir Austriaca 28 [Suppl 120]: 184-185
5. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10: 150-154
6. Müller W, Biedert R, Hefti F, Jakob RP, Munzinger U, Stäubli HU (1988) OAK knee evaluation. Clin Orthop 232: 37-50
7. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198: 43-49
8. Fleming BC, Good L, Peura GD, Beynnon BD (1999) Calibration and application of an intra-articular force transducer for the measurement of patellar tendon graft forces: an in situ evaluation. J Biomech Eng 121: 393-398
9. Zacherl J (1993) Der Ersatz des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem künstlichen Leeds-Keio-Ligament. Wien Klin Wochenschr 105: 147-151
10. Lahoda LU (1993) Der Vergleich der parallel und divergent augmentierten Rekonstruktionen des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Wien Klin Wochenschr 105: 558-559
11. Goss C, Hull ML, Howell SM (1997) Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthop Res 15: 263-268
12. Kdolsky R (1989) Ergebnisse von Kunststoffbandverstärkung von Rekonstruktionen des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Wien Klin Wochenschr 101: 750-753
13. Hanley P, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Hunter RE, Kirstukas S, Kowalczyk C (1989) Load sharing and graft forces in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the Ligament Augmentation Device. Am J Sports Med 17: 414-422
14. Chan KM, Qin L, Li CK, Hung LK, Tang CY, Rolf C (2000) Removal of the lateral or medial third of patellar tendon alters the patellofemoral contact pressure and area: an in vitro experimental study in dogs. Clin Biomech 15: 695-701
15. Herzog W, Diet S, Suter E, Mayzus P, Leonard TR, Muller C, et al (1998) Material and functional properties of articular cartilage and patellofemoral contact mechanics in an experimental model of osteoarthritis. J Biomech 31: 1137-1145
16. Wu JZ, Herzog W, Epstein M (2000) Joint contact mechanics in the early stages of osteoarthritis. Med Eng Phys 22: 1-12
17. Lee TQ, Gerken AP, Glaser FE, Kim WC, Anzel SH (1997) Patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact pressures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 340: 257-266
18. MacDonald P, Miniaci A, Fowler P, Marks P, Finlay B (1996) A biomechanical analysis of joint contact forces in the posterior cruciate deficient knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3: 252-255
19. Morgan E, Ostrum RF, DiCicco J, McElroy J, Poka A (1999) Effects of retrograde femoral intramedullary nailing on the patellofemoral articulation. J Orthop Trauma 13: 13-16
20. Morgan EA, McElroy JJ, DesJardins JD, Anderson DD, Steensen RN (1996) The effect of intercondylar notchplasty on the patellofemoral articulation. Am J Sports Med 24: 843-846.
21. Simonian PT, Sussmann PS, Wickiewicz TL, Paletta GA, Warren RF (1998) Contact pressures at osteochondral donor sites in the knee. Am J Sports Med 26: 491-494
22. Kdolsky RK, Reihsner R, Fuchs M, Pöttinger C, Beer RJ (1997) Pressure distribution in human cadaver knee joints without external loading. Orthop Transactions 20: 981-982
23. Harris ML, Morberg P, Bruce WJM, Walsh WR (1999) An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film. J Biomech 32: 951-958
24. Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH (2002) Effect of Fuji pressure sensitive film on actual contact characteristics of artificial tibiofemoral joint. Clin Biomech 17: 698-704
25. Kuroda R, Kambic H, Valdevit A, Andrish JT (2001) Articular cartilage contact pressure after tibial tuberosity transfer. Am J Sports Med 29: 403-409
26. Grunder W, Kanowski M, Wagner M, Werner A (2000) Visualization of pressure distribution within loaded joint cartilage by application of angle-sensitive NMR microscopy. Magn Reson Med 43: 884-891
27. Herberhold C, Faber S, Stammberger T, Steinlechner M, Putz R, Englmeier KH, et al (1999) In situ measurement of articular cartilage deformation in intact femoropatellar joints under static loading. J Biomech 32: 1287-1295
28. Herberhold C, Stammberger T, Faber S, Putz R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, et al (1998) An MR-based technique for quantifying the deformation of articular cartilage during mechanical loading in an intact cadaver joint. Magn Reson Med 39: 843-850
29. DeMarco AL, Rust DA, Bachus KN (2000) Measuring contact pressure and contact area in orthopaedic applications: Fuji film vs. Tekscan. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando FL, p 518
30. Wirz D, Becker R, Li SF, Friederich NF, Müller W (2002) Die Validierung des Tekscan-Systems für statische und dynamische Druckmessungen am humanen Femorotibialgelenk. Biomed Tech 47: 195-201