-
5
-
-
0003780361
-
-
Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper no. 00-02 (Washington: Urban Institute)
-
M. Krebs-Carter and J. Holahan, "State Strategies for Covering Uninsured Adults," Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper no. 00-02 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2000) ; and E. Howell et al., "Early Experience with Covering Parents under SCHIP," Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. A-51 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2002).
-
(2000)
State Strategies for Covering Uninsured Adults
-
-
Krebs-Carter, M.1
Holahan, J.2
-
6
-
-
1842733630
-
-
Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. A-51 (Washington: Urban Institute)
-
M. Krebs-Carter and J. Holahan, "State Strategies for Covering Uninsured Adults," Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper no. 00-02 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2000) ; and E. Howell et al., "Early Experience with Covering Parents under SCHIP," Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. A-51 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2002).
-
(2002)
Early Experience with Covering Parents under SCHIP
-
-
Howell, E.1
-
8
-
-
0032745656
-
The National Survey of America's Families: An Overview of the Health Policy Component
-
for more detail on the survey. Parents with children age eighteen and older are not included in this analysis. The part of this exclusion that is potentially relevant involves parents of eighteen-year-olds who do not have younger children
-
See G. Kenney et al., "The National Survey of America's Families: An Overview of the Health Policy Component," Inquiry 36, no. 3 (1999): 353-362, for more detail on the survey. Parents with children age eighteen and older are not included in this analysis. The part of this exclusion that is potentially relevant involves parents of eighteen-year-olds who do not have younger children.
-
(1999)
Inquiry
, vol.36
, Issue.3
, pp. 353-362
-
-
Kenney, G.1
-
9
-
-
85039517031
-
-
These thirteen states are Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin
-
These thirteen states are Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0003923466
-
-
Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-20 (Washington: Urban Institute)
-
The majority of states could cover these parents through Medicaid using Section 1931 provisions; the remaining states would need to equalize their Title XIX standards for children to cover all of these parents or obtain a SCHIP or HIFA waiver. By 2002 all states could cover parents up to 100 percent of poverty under Medicaid's Section 1931 authority. For a full discussion, see L. Dubay, G. Kenney, and S. Zuckerman, "Extending Medicaid to Parents: An Incremental Strategy for Reducing the Number of Uninsured," Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-20 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2000).
-
(2000)
Extending Medicaid to Parents: An Incremental Strategy for Reducing the Number of Uninsured
-
-
Dubay, L.1
Kenney, G.2
Zuckerman, S.3
-
14
-
-
30844456355
-
-
Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
-
G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and S. Blumberg, Awareness and Perceptions of Medicaid and SCHIP Programs among Low-Income Families with Uninsured Children: Findings from Early 2001 (Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2002); G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and L. Dubay, "How Familiar Are Low-Income Parents with Medicaid and SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-34 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001); and G.M. Kenney and J. Haley, "Why Aren't More Uninsured Children Enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-35 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001).
-
(2002)
Awareness and Perceptions of Medicaid and SCHIP Programs among Low-Income Families with Uninsured Children: Findings from Early 2001
-
-
Kenney, G.M.1
Haley, J.2
Blumberg, S.3
-
15
-
-
1842605894
-
-
Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-34 (Washington: Urban Institute)
-
G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and S. Blumberg, Awareness and Perceptions of Medicaid and SCHIP Programs among Low-Income Families with Uninsured Children: Findings from Early 2001 (Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2002); G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and L. Dubay, "How Familiar Are Low-Income Parents with Medicaid and SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-34 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001); and G.M. Kenney and J. Haley, "Why Aren't More Uninsured Children Enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-35 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001).
-
(2001)
How Familiar Are Low-Income Parents with Medicaid and SCHIP?
-
-
Kenney, G.M.1
Haley, J.2
Dubay, L.3
-
16
-
-
0003732746
-
-
Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-35 (Washington: Urban Institute)
-
G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and S. Blumberg, Awareness and Perceptions of Medicaid and SCHIP Programs among Low-Income Families with Uninsured Children: Findings from Early 2001 (Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2002); G.M. Kenney, J. Haley, and L. Dubay, "How Familiar Are Low-Income Parents with Medicaid and SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-34 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001); and G.M. Kenney and J. Haley, "Why Aren't More Uninsured Children Enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP?" Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief no. B-35 (Washington: Urban Institute, 2001).
-
(2001)
Why Aren't More Uninsured Children Enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP?
-
-
Kenney, G.M.1
Haley, J.2
-
18
-
-
85039512806
-
-
note
-
This analysis examines access and use measures for uninsured parents whose children are eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP. The point estimates for these measures were very similar when we examined the subset of uninsured parents whose children are already enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
0344629740
-
The Effects of Parents' Insurance Coverage on Access to Care for Low-Income Children
-
A Davidoff et al., "The Effects of Parents' Insurance Coverage on Access to Care for Low-Income Children," Inquiry 40, no. 3 (2003): 254-268; and L. Dubay and G. Kenney, "Expanding Health Insurance Coverage to Parents: Effects on Children's Coverage under Medicaid," Health Services Research 38, no. 5 (2003): 1283-1302.
-
(2003)
Inquiry
, vol.40
, Issue.3
, pp. 254-268
-
-
Davidoff, A.1
-
20
-
-
0142057526
-
Expanding Health Insurance Coverage to Parents: Effects on Children's Coverage under Medicaid
-
A Davidoff et al., "The Effects of Parents' Insurance Coverage on Access to Care for Low-Income Children," Inquiry 40, no. 3 (2003): 254-268; and L. Dubay and G. Kenney, "Expanding Health Insurance Coverage to Parents: Effects on Children's Coverage under Medicaid," Health Services Research 38, no. 5 (2003): 1283-1302.
-
(2003)
Health Services Research
, vol.38
, Issue.5
, pp. 1283-1302
-
-
Dubay, L.1
Kenney, G.2
-
22
-
-
1642309811
-
-
Washington: Institute for Health Policy Solutions
-
E. Neuschler and R. Curtis, "Premium Assistance: What Works? What Doesn't?" (Washington: Institute for Health Policy Solutions, 2003); and M. McClellan and K. Baicker, "Reducing Uninsurance through the Nongroup Market: Health Insurance Credits and Purchasing Groups," Health Affairs, 23 October 2002, content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w2.363 (15 December 2003).
-
(2003)
Premium Assistance: What Works? What Doesn't?
-
-
Neuschler, E.1
Curtis, R.2
-
23
-
-
1842784223
-
Reducing Uninsurance through the Nongroup Market: Health Insurance Credits and Purchasing Groups
-
23 October 2002, content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff. w2.363 (15 December)
-
E. Neuschler and R. Curtis, "Premium Assistance: What Works? What Doesn't?" (Washington: Institute for Health Policy Solutions, 2003); and M. McClellan and K. Baicker, "Reducing Uninsurance through the Nongroup Market: Health Insurance Credits and Purchasing Groups," Health Affairs, 23 October 2002, content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w2.363 (15 December 2003).
-
(2003)
Health Affairs
-
-
McClellan, M.1
Baicker, K.2
-
28
-
-
85039530758
-
Scully Says Increased Federal Funds for States' Medicaid Programs Unlikely
-
16 July 2002, 15 December
-
J. Guyer and C. Mann, Taking the Next Steps: States Can Now Take Advantage of Federal Medicaid Matching Funds to Expand Health Care Coverage to Low-Income Working Parents (Washington: Center on Budget Priorities, 1998); and "Scully Says Increased Federal Funds for States' Medicaid Programs Unlikely," Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 16 July 2002, www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=12341 (15 December 2003).
-
(2003)
Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report
-
-
-
31
-
-
85039520304
-
Covering the Uninsured: Can States Take the Lead?
-
forthcoming
-
L. Dubay, C. Moylan, and T. Oliver, "Covering the Uninsured: Can States Take the Lead?" Journal of Law and Health Care Policy (forthcoming); and J. Holahan, A. Weil, and J. Wiener, Federalism and Health Policy (Washington: Urban Institute, 2003).
-
Journal of Law and Health Care Policy
-
-
Dubay, L.1
Moylan, C.2
Oliver, T.3
-
32
-
-
1642399171
-
-
Washington: Urban Institute
-
L. Dubay, C. Moylan, and T. Oliver, "Covering the Uninsured: Can States Take the Lead?" Journal of Law and Health Care Policy (forthcoming); and J. Holahan, A. Weil, and J. Wiener, Federalism and Health Policy (Washington: Urban Institute, 2003).
-
(2003)
Federalism and Health Policy
-
-
Holahan, J.1
Weil, A.2
Wiener, J.3
|