|
|
|
Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-55
|
|
When Vitalism is Dead Wrong: The Discrimination Against and Torture of Incompetent Patients by Compulsory Life-Sustaining Treatment
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 1990;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
CUSTODY;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL PATIENT;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHILOSOPHY;
REVIEW;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 1990;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
COERCION;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HUMANS;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS;
NEW YORK;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
PROXY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
VITALISM;
|
|
EID: 1842664289
PISSN: 00196665
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|