Contribution made by the maize variety Mindszentpusztai Yellow Dent (MYD) to the birth of hybrid maize in Hungary and in Europe as a whole Review

Cereal Research Communications

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 159-166

  Hadi, G ^a   Marton, L C ^a   Szundy, T ^a   Kovacs I ^a   Pinter J ^a   Dolinka, B ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Heterosis sources; Maize breeding

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 1842660156     PISSN: 01333720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03543294     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Balogh, J. (1988): A kukorica fajtaszerkezete Magyarországon 1938-1987. között. (Maize varieties available in Hungary 1938-1987.) Gabonamag Alapanyagszaporító Gazdasági Tá rsaság. Budapest 77 p.
2. Brunklaus-Jung, E., Ludwig, W. F., Boppenmaier, J., Melchinger, A. E., Herrmann, R.G. (1993): RFLP analyses of early maturing European maize germplasm: H. Correlation between RFLP and pedigree data. Maydica 38. 239-244.
3. Darrah, L. L., Zuber, M. S. (1985): 1985 United States farm maize germplasm base and commercial breeding strategies. Crop. Sci. 26. 1109-1113.
4. Dubreuil, P., Dufour, P., Krajci, E., Causee, M., de Vienne, D., Gallais, A., Charcosset, A. (1996): Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci. 36. 790-799.
5. Dudley, J. W., Saghai Maroof, M. A., Rufener, G. K. (1991): Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop. Sci. 31. 719-723.
6. Duvick, D. N. (1984): Genetic diversity in major farm crops on the farm and in reserve. Economic Botany. 38. (2) pp. 161-178.
7. Duvick, D. N., Cassman, K. G. (1999): Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Sci. 39. 1622-1630.
8. Fleischmann, R. (1913a): A rumai uradalom tengeri nemesíto eljárása. (Maize breeding method followed on the Ruma estate.) Köztelek 23. 1694-1697.
9. Fleischmann, R. (1913b): A tengericso alakulásának jelentosége a tengeri nemesítésénél. (Importance of ear formation in maize breeding.) Köztelek 23. 3012-3013.
10. Fleischmann, R. (1914): A rumai uradalom kukoricája. (The maize developed on the Ruma estate.) Gazdasági Lapok 66. 345-346.
11. Fleischmann, R. (1916): A nemesített tengeri fajták kipróbálása és a tengeri nemesítése. (Testing of improved maize varieties and the breeding of maize.) Köztelek 26. 585-586.
12. Fleischmann, R. (1920): Kukoricaterméseink fokozása fajtanemesítés útján. (Improvements in maize yields by variety breeding.) Köztelek 30. 753-754.
13. Fleischmann, R. (1934): Az "F" kukorica termoké pességének kialakulása nemesítés útján. (Trends in the yield potential of "F" maize as the result of breeding.) Köztelek 44. 400-401.
14. Fleischmann, R. (1939): Az "F" kukorica újabb fejlodése. (Recent improvements in "F" maize.) Köztelek 49. 264-265.
15. Frei, O. M. (2000): Changes in yield physiology of corn as a result of breeding in Northern Europe. Maydica 45. 173-183.
16. Hadi, G. (2003a): Contribution of population improvement to the development of maize lines with commercial value. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 51. 11-17.
17. Hadi, G. (2003b): Role of open-pollinated populations in the development of maize lines with commercial value. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 51. 229-235.
18. Hallauer, A. R., Miranda, FO. I. B. (1981): Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press. Ames.
19. Hegedüs, B. A. (1996): Építeni szó rakoztatóbb, mint nem építeni. Pap Endre az elso európai hibridkukorica nemesítoje elmondja életét. (To build is more fun than not to build. Endre Pap, breeder of Europe's first maize hybrid, recounts his life.) MTA Mg.Kut. Int. Martonvásár.
20. Jánossy, A., Komlóssy, G., Mórász, S., Taróczi, H. (1957): Magyar kukoricafajták és termesztésük. (Hungarian maize varieties and their cultivation.) Mezogazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 5-72.
21. Kovács, I. (1970): Selection and evaluation of basic material for breeding. In: Kovács. I. (ed.), Some Methodological Achievements of the Hungarian Hybrid Maize Breeding. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. pp. 23-64.
22. Kovarski, A. E., Utshkovski, V. G., Tshalik, T. S., Borovski, M. I. (1965): Perspektivnie kishinevskie gibridi kukuruzi. (Promising maize hybrids from Kishinev.) In: Kovarski. A. E. (ed.), Genetika, selektsia i zamenovodstvo kukuruzi. Izd. Karta Moldovenskaia, Kishinev, pp. 3-41.
23. Melchinger, A. E., Messmer, M. M., Lee, M., Woodman, W. L., Lamkey, K. R. (1991): Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop. Sci. 31. 669-677.
24. Messmer, M. M., Melchinger, A. E., Hessmann, R. G., Boppenmaier, J. (1993): Comparison of pedigree and RFLP data. Crop Sci. 33. 944-950.
25. Messmer, M. M., Melchinger, A. E., Lee, M., Woodman, W. L., Lee, A. E., Lamkey, K. R. (1991): Genetic diversity among progenitors and elite lines from the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) maize population: Comparison of allozyme and RFLP data, Theor. Appl. Genet. 83. 97-107.
26. Misevic, D. (1989a): Heterotic patterns among U.S. Corn Belt. Yugoslavian and exotic maize populations. Maydica 34. 353-363.
27. Misevic, D. (1989b): Evaluation of three test statistics used to identify maize-inbred lines with new favorable alleles not present in elite single cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77. 402-408.
28. Misevic, D. (1989c): Identification of inbred lines as a source of new alleles for improvement of elite maize single crosses. Crop Sci. 29. 1120-1125.
29. Misevic, D. (1990): Evaluation of commercial maize hybrids as sources of new favorable alleles. Maydica 35. 287-295.
30. Mumm, R. H., Dudley, J. W. (1994): A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34. 842-851.
31. Mumm, R. H., Hubert, L. J., Dudley, J. W. (1994): A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: II. Validitation of cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34. 852-865.
32. Radovic, G., Jelovac, D. (1995): Identification of the heterotic pattern in Yugoslav maize germplasm. Maydica 40. 223-227.
33. Smith, J. S. C., Goodman, M. M., Stuber, C. W. (1985a): Genetic variability within U.S. maize germplasm. I. Historically important lines. Crop Sci. 25. 550-555.
34. Smith, J. S. C., Goodman, M. M., Stuber, C. W. (1985b): Genetic variability within U.S. maize germplasm. II. Widely-used inbred lines 1970 to 1979. Crop Sci. 25. 681-685.
35. Smith, J. S. C., Smith, O. S. (1989): The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica. 34. 151-161.
36. Smith, J. S. C., Smith, O. S. (1991): Restriction fragment length polymorphisms can differentiate among U.S. maize hybrids. Crop. Sci. 31. 893-899.
37. Smith, J. S. C., Smith, O. S., Bowen, S. L., Tenborg, R. A., Wall, S. J. (1991): The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III. Revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica. 36. 213-226.
38. Surányi, J. (1938): Három évi kisérletek kukoricafajtákkal 1934-1936. (Three years of experiments on maize varieties 1934-1936.) Országos M. Kir. Növénytermeszté si Kïsérleti Állomás Jelentései. Magyaróvár. 4 (1). 1-199.
39. Taróczi, H. (1952): Kukorica. (Maize.) In: Jánossy, A. (ed.), Nemesített növényfajtákkal végzett orszagos fajtakísérletek eredményei 1951. Mezogazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 91-117.
40. Troyer, A. F. (1990): A retrospective view of corn genetic resources. Journ. of Hered. 81. (1) 17-24.
41. Troyer, A. F. (1999): Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci. 39. 601-626.
42. Villax, Ö., Surányi, J. (1932): Maissorten in Ungarn. (Varieties of corn in Hungary.) Magyaróvár. pp. 1-64.
43. Williams, T. R., Hallauer, A. F. (2000): Genetic diversity among maize hybrids. Maydica 45. 163-171.
44. Zuber, M. S., Darrah, L. L. (1980): 1979 U.S. corn germplasm base. Annu. Corn and Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf., 35. 234-249. 166