Extensible semantics for representing electromechanical assemblies

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1 A, Issue , 2003, Pages 581-590

  Kopena, Joseph ^a   Regli, William C ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; XML;

DARPA AGENT MARKUP LANGUAGE (DAML); ELECTROMECHANICAL ASSEMBLIES;

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING;

EID: 1842636209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2003/cie-48233     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Anantha, R., Kramer, G. A., and Crawford, R. H. 1996. Assembly modelling by geometric constraint satisfaction. Computer-Aided Design, 28(9):707-722.
2. Baget, J.-F., Genest, D., and Mugnier, M.-L. 1999. Knowledge Acquisition with a Pure Graph-Based Knowledge Representation Model. In Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management.
3. Bose, A., Gini, M., and Riley, D. 1997. A Case-Based Approach to Planar Linkage Design. AIE, 11 (2): 107-119.
4. DARPA 2001a. DAML+OIL March 2001 Specifications. http://www.daml.org/ 2001/03/daml+oil-index.
5. DARPA 2001b. DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML). http://www.daml.org/.
6. Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C., and Khosla, P. 2000. Organization and Selection of Reconfigurable Models. In IEEE Winter Simulation Conference.
7. Faltings, B. 1990. Qualitative Kinematics in Mechanisms. Artificial Intelligence, 44:89-119.
8. Forbus, K. 1984. Qualitative Process Theory. AIJ, 24:85.
9. Fowler, J. E. 1996. Variant Design for Mechanical Artifacts: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Eng. with Computers, 12:1-15.
10. Friedman-Hill, E. 1995. Jess: The Rule Engine for the Java Platform. http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/.
11. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., S, S., and Wood, K. 2001. Evolving a Functional Basis for Engineering Design. In ASME, DETC01/DTM-21688.
12. Hoffmann, C. M. and Joan-Arinyo, R. 1997. Symbolic Constraints in Constructive Geometric Constraint Solving. In Journal of Symbolic Computation, pp. 287-300.
13. Kim, G. J. 1997. Case-based Design for Assembly. Computer Aided Design, 29(7):497-506.
14. Kirschman, C., Fadel, G., and Jara-Almonte, C. 1996. Classifying Functions for Mechanical Design. In ASME, DETC96/DTM-1504.
15. Kopena, J. 2001. DAMLJessKB: DAML Knowledge Base Software. http://plan.mcs.drexel.edu/projects/legorobots/design/software/DAMLJess%KB/.
16. Kuipers, B. 1984. Commonsense Reasoning about Causality: Deriving Behavior from Structure. AI, 24:169-204.
17. Lee, K. and Andrews, G. 1985. Inference of the positions of components in an assembly: part 2. CAD. pp. 20-24.
18. Sinha, R., Paredis, C., and Khosla, P. 2001. Interaction Modeling in Systems Design. In ASME, DETC01/CIE.
19. Sowa, J. F. 1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (MA).
20. Sowa, J. F. 2001. Proposed ISO Standard on Cone. Graphs. http://users.bestweb.net/~sowa/cg/.
21. Subramanian, D. and Wang, C. 1993. Kinematic synthesis with configuration spaces. In Qual. Reasoning 93, pp. 228-239.
22. Szykman, S., Racz, J. W., and Sriram, R. D. 1999a. The Representation of Function in Computer-based Design. In ASME, DETC99/DTM-8742.
23. Szykman, S., Senfaute, J., and Sriram, R. D. 1999b. Using XML to Describe Function and Taxonomies in Computer-based Design. In ASME, DETC99/CIE-9025.
24. Umeda, Y. and Tomiyama, T. 1997. Functional Reasoning in Design. IEEE Expert and Intelligent Systems, 12(2):42-48.
25. W3C 2000. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3c.org/RDF.